1985
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Spontaneous Verbal Responding in Autustic Children Using a Time Delay Procedure

Abstract: One oft-cited problem with teaching speech skills to autistic children is the failure of the speech to be spontaneous. That is, the children's speech often remains under the control of the verbal behavior of others rather than under the control of other nonverbal referents in the environment. We investigated the effectiveness of a time delay procedure to increase the spontaneous speech of seven autistic children. Initially, the experiment presented a desired object (e.g., cookie) and immediately modeled the ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
186
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
186
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such procedures often entail presenting a preferred item while simultaneously asking the individual, "What do you want?" vocally prompting a correct response, reinforcing correct responses with access to the requested item, and using constant or graduated time delay procedures to fade the vocal prompt (e.g., Charlop, Schreibman, & Thibodeau, 1985;Drash, High, & Tudor, 1999;Shafer, 1994;Simic & Bucher, 1980). It is important that an economic and efficient instruc-tional protocol be adopted, particularly when teaching language skills to adults with severe disabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such procedures often entail presenting a preferred item while simultaneously asking the individual, "What do you want?" vocally prompting a correct response, reinforcing correct responses with access to the requested item, and using constant or graduated time delay procedures to fade the vocal prompt (e.g., Charlop, Schreibman, & Thibodeau, 1985;Drash, High, & Tudor, 1999;Shafer, 1994;Simic & Bucher, 1980). It is important that an economic and efficient instruc-tional protocol be adopted, particularly when teaching language skills to adults with severe disabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies reporting the use of reinforcement procedures to bolster grammaticality also appeared around this time (e.g., H. B. Clark & Sherman, 1975;Garcia, 1974;Garcia & Batista-Wallace, 1977;Garcia, Guess, & Byrnes, 1973;Hester & Hendrickson, 1977;Heward & Eachus, 1979;Martin, 1975;Sailor, 1971;StevensLong & Rasmussen, 1974) and during the ensuing decades (e.g., Charlop, Schreibman, & Thibodeau, 1985;Chase, Ellenwood, & Madden, 2008;Greer & Yuan, 2008;Hernandez, Hanley, & Ingvarsson, 2007;Secan, Egel, & Tilley, 1989;Whitehurst & ValdezMenchaca, 1988;Wulfert & Hayes, 1988).…”
Section: Mythmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This was influenced directly by the work by Skinner (1968Skinner ( /1972. The discrete trial teaching procedure (DTT), which greatly defines the interventions at LAPITEA has been documented along the years in several manuals based on scientific research concerning developmental delays (Alwell, Hunt, Goetz, & Sailor, 1989;Barbera, 2007;Charlop-Christy & Carpenter, 2000;Charlop, Schreibman & Thibodeau, 1985;Charlop & Trasowech, 1991;Charlop & Walsh, 1986;Gee, Graham, Goetz, Oshima, & Yoshioka, 1991;Greer & Ross, 2008;Matos, 2016;Richman, 2001;Sundberg & Partington, 1998) and is based on givingseveral opportunities to respond (massed trials). However, the D. C. de Matos, P. G. S. de Matos Psychology need to conduct both DTT in a more structured environment as well as more naturalistic teaching during the day-to-day of individuals with autism in less restricted environments is advised (Sundberg & Partington, 1998).…”
Section: C De Matos P G S De Matos Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%