2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2014.6907545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the accuracy and the repeatability of position control for micromanipulations using Heteroscedastic Gaussian Processes

Abstract: Abstract-Many recent studies describe micromanipulation systems by using complex Analytic Forward Models (AFM), but such models are difficult to build and incapable of describing unmodelable factors, such as manufacturing defects. In this work, we propose the Enhanced Analytic Forward Model (EAFM), an integrated model of the AFM and the Heteroscedastic Gaussian Processes (HGP). The EAFM can compensate the shortfalls of the AFM by training the HGP on the residual of the AFM. This also allows the HGP to learn th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nominal inverse kinematic model of the CPM can be formulated according to the geometric relationships of the CPM. However, it cannot be used to control the CPM directly, since there are many unmodeled factors in the 3-PRR CPM are not considered in that model, such as the rotation error of the AEP superelastic flexures, the material nonlinearity, the manufacture uncertainties, and the assembling errors [19]. To deal with the model mismatches and external disturbances of CPMs, many close-loop control strategies are proposed, such as the PID controller, sliding mode controller, robust controller and the adaptive neural network controller [20]- [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nominal inverse kinematic model of the CPM can be formulated according to the geometric relationships of the CPM. However, it cannot be used to control the CPM directly, since there are many unmodeled factors in the 3-PRR CPM are not considered in that model, such as the rotation error of the AEP superelastic flexures, the material nonlinearity, the manufacture uncertainties, and the assembling errors [19]. To deal with the model mismatches and external disturbances of CPMs, many close-loop control strategies are proposed, such as the PID controller, sliding mode controller, robust controller and the adaptive neural network controller [20]- [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%