2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00543.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the Accuracy of Productivity and Survival Estimates in Assessing Landbird Population Status

Abstract: The conservation of species with declining populations requires information on population demography and identification of factors that limit population growth. For landbird species, an understanding of large-scale population declines often requires assessment of local population processes, including the production of offspring, the survival of those offspring, and adult survival. Population growth has been modeled for several species of landbirds to date, and these studies have provided important information … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our results, and those of other recent studies (Anders and Marshall 2005), fledgling songbird survival is generally lower and more variable than the values included in population models. We agree with Anders and Marshall (2005) that in the absence of fledgling survival data, population models should include lower and more variable values for first-year survival than in previous modeling efforts. However, our results demonstrate that fledgling survival can be relatively high in years (and in areas) that nest productivity is relatively low, and that population growth can be more sensitive to fledgling survival than to nest productivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Based on our results, and those of other recent studies (Anders and Marshall 2005), fledgling songbird survival is generally lower and more variable than the values included in population models. We agree with Anders and Marshall (2005) that in the absence of fledgling survival data, population models should include lower and more variable values for first-year survival than in previous modeling efforts. However, our results demonstrate that fledgling survival can be relatively high in years (and in areas) that nest productivity is relatively low, and that population growth can be more sensitive to fledgling survival than to nest productivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Demographic parameters responsible for changes in population size are fecundity, survival probability, and dispersal probability (Cilimburg et al 2002, Anders & Marshall 2005. Because breeding dispersal is difficult to document, permanent emigration and mortality are usually not distinguished in estimates of passerine survival (Cilimburg et al 2002, Gilroy et al 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether survival in juveniles, helpers, and dominants should be separated by class, sex, both, or neither in the matrix model, Cormack-Jolly-Seber estimation methods were applied to color band resight data (described above; Pollock et al, 1990;Lebreton et al, 1992). We estimated both apparent survival and the probability of resight because individuals may have been present on study areas but missed when resighting color-bands (Anders and Marshall, 2005). We constructed biologically reasonable survival models with covariates for sex and life-stage, and combined parameter estimates (Table 1).…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%