2008
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.10.6777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the CD4+ T Cell Precursor Frequency Leads to Competition for IFN-γ Thereby Degrading Memory Cell Quantity and Quality

Abstract: The precursor frequency of naive CD4+ T cells shows an inverse relationship with the number of memory cells generated after exposure to cognate Ag. Using the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) model, we show here that only when the initial number of naive virus-specific CD4+ T cell precursors is low (≤104 per spleen) do they give rise to abundant and homogeneous memory cells that are CD62Llow, IL-7Rhigh, and imbued with an enhanced capacity to produce cytokine, proliferate, and survive over time. Furthe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…77 Competition during the primary CD4 + T-cell response for factors other than TCR, such as IFNc, has also been shown to impact the quantity and quality of ensuing memory T-cell populations. 78 Our recent findings have also indicated that not all CD4 + T-cell clones that undergo massive expansion and effector differentiation in response to acute infection are capable of populating the memory pool. 79 Small numbers of adoptively transferred SMARTA TCR transgenic T cells, which are specific for the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) glycoprotein-derived immunodominant CD4 + T-cell epitope GP [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80] , effectively mimic endogenous CD4 + T-cell responses in the same host following LCMV infection.…”
Section: Tcr-driven Differentiation: Cd4 + T Cellsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…77 Competition during the primary CD4 + T-cell response for factors other than TCR, such as IFNc, has also been shown to impact the quantity and quality of ensuing memory T-cell populations. 78 Our recent findings have also indicated that not all CD4 + T-cell clones that undergo massive expansion and effector differentiation in response to acute infection are capable of populating the memory pool. 79 Small numbers of adoptively transferred SMARTA TCR transgenic T cells, which are specific for the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) glycoprotein-derived immunodominant CD4 + T-cell epitope GP [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80] , effectively mimic endogenous CD4 + T-cell responses in the same host following LCMV infection.…”
Section: Tcr-driven Differentiation: Cd4 + T Cellsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Among possible mechanisms determining the poorer expansion seen at higher precursor frequency would be competition of the responding cells for access to peptide/MHC complexes and/ or for costimulatory molecules expressed on the APC (11,26,27), competition for locally produced growth-promoting factors (28)(29)(30), or inhibition by the action of cells within the microenvironment of the cluster of responding cells (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as they respond to infection (30, 31). We hypothesized that the LAG-3 −/− P14 cells better competed for these resources than WT P14 cells and were better able to accumulate after infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%