2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005jb004126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the efficiency of paleointensity analyses by selection of samples using first‐order reversal curve diagrams

Abstract: [1] The global paleointensity database is restricted by the high failure rate of paleointensity analyses. Excluding thermal alteration, failure is usually caused by the presence of multidomain grains and interactions among grains, two properties that can be identified using first-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams. We measured FORC diagrams on sister samples of about 200 samples that had been used for Thellier paleointensity determinations and determined criteria to discriminate samples that gave acceptable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in sharp contrast to most igneous rocks (Carvallo et al, 2006) and to the altered olivine. Therefore, FORC diagrams can be a very effective pre-selection tool for paleointensity studies on plutonic rocks which contain exsolved magnetite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in sharp contrast to most igneous rocks (Carvallo et al, 2006) and to the altered olivine. Therefore, FORC diagrams can be a very effective pre-selection tool for paleointensity studies on plutonic rocks which contain exsolved magnetite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1(b)) carries a low NRM/TRM ratio. Although the FORC diagrams indicate some magnetostatic interactions, the interaction seems to be low compared to volcanic rocks which yielded successful Thellier paleointensity results (Carvallo et al, 2006); thus, the magnetostatic interactions are unlikely to explain the low NRM/TRM. The low NRM/TRM is considered to simply reflect the low efficiency of chemical remanence (e.g., Stacy and Banerjee, 1974).…”
Section: Effect Of Hydrothermal Alteration On Paleointensitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, rocks rarely contain ideal assemblages of monodisperse SD particles. Techniques used to determine the magnetic domain state of remanence carriers, such as plotting the ratio of saturation remanence over saturation magnetization (M RS /M S ) versus the ratio of coercivity of remanence over coercive force (B CR /B C ) [Day et al, 1977], or determining first-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams [Pike et al, 1999;Roberts et al, 2000], often reveal the presence of a mixture of SD and multidomain (MD) particles, or of pseudosingle-domain (PSD) particles [e.g., Dunlop, 2002;Carvallo et al, 2006]. These larger particles generally have a lower magnetic stability than SD particles and can lead to erroneous determinations of absolute paleointensity [e.g., Krása et al, 2003;Leonhardt et al, 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several pre-selection procedures before archaeointensity determinations have been proposed (e.g. Cui & Verosub 1995;Cui et al 1997;Jordanova et al 1997Jordanova et al , 2001Leonhardt et al 2004;Carvallo et al 2006). Nevertheless, some of these procedures are almost as time consuming as a Thellier experiment and a full success cannot still be guaranteed.…”
Section: Re-evaluation Of Previous Results Through Magnetic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%