2019
DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the Impact of Industry–Academia Collaboration through Co-Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Once more the described practices are coherent with a DT-mindset, but DT was not explicitly applied or mentioned. A recent action research study reveals a positive impact of co-production / co-creation activities (as in DT) to joint problem formulation, research methodology, capacity-building, communication, and project outcome in industry-academia collaborations (Sannö, Ericsen Öberg, Flores-Garcia, & Jackson, 2019), however, DT has not been mentioned specifically as facilitation tool.…”
Section: Industry-academia Research and Innovation Consortia And Desimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once more the described practices are coherent with a DT-mindset, but DT was not explicitly applied or mentioned. A recent action research study reveals a positive impact of co-production / co-creation activities (as in DT) to joint problem formulation, research methodology, capacity-building, communication, and project outcome in industry-academia collaborations (Sannö, Ericsen Öberg, Flores-Garcia, & Jackson, 2019), however, DT has not been mentioned specifically as facilitation tool.…”
Section: Industry-academia Research and Innovation Consortia And Desimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To keep focus and interest in the research project it is essential that the research project address a problem area and research questions that are of interest for both practitioners and academia (Svensson et al, 2 007; Gallien et al , 2016; Toffel, 2016). In addition, Sannö et al (2019) point out that it is equally important to have a shared view on the expected results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different collaborative approaches and attempts to bridge the gap between research and practice and increase the practical relevance of research, for example collaborative management research, action research and interactive research (Coughlan and Coghlan, 2002; Adler et al , 2004; Aagard Nielsen and Svensson, 2006). This also includes reported research on how collaboration between researchers and practitioners increases our understanding of performance excellence (Latham, 2008) and that co-production of knowledge is one way to increase the impact of industry-academia collaboration (Sannö et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific knowledge that does not make the required contribution seriously hinders university-industry collaboration. If the universities are not creating knowledge and skills and disseminate it to solve industry problems, the industry will remain ignorant and reluctant to apply the new technologies discovered by the universities (Sannö et al, 2019).…”
Section: Farmer-academia Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%