2009
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.090860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the infliximab dose in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomised, double blind study failed to confirm its efficacy

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of infliximab dose escalation in incomplete responders in a randomised controlled trial. Methods: 141 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with infliximab for 12 months (3 mg/kg; intervals 0, 2, 6 and then 8 weeks) who responded to the drug (disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) decrease .1.2) but who were not in remission (DAS28 .2.6) were enrolled into the study. Patients were randomly assigned into arm A, 3 mg/kg, and arm B, 5 mg/kg infliximab every 8 weeks. Out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
33
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…) after initial failure of the lower dosage to lead to remission [31]. Moreover, the higher dosage had a poorer safety profile.…”
Section: Choice Of Biologic After Failure Of the Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) after initial failure of the lower dosage to lead to remission [31]. Moreover, the higher dosage had a poorer safety profile.…”
Section: Choice Of Biologic After Failure Of the Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dose escalation of anti-TNF agents has shown only limited effectiveness in the long-term control of RA (mainly for infliximab and less so for other biologics). 34,40,41 Similarly, approximately 15% of patients failed the criterion for increased corticosteroid doses, but in clinical practice, this may enable patients to achieve clinical endpoints without changing the dose of the biologic. Conversely, the low adherence criterion caused a substantial proportion of both SC and IV biologics to be classified as "not effective"; some patients may reduce the frequency of dosing or stop the medication when their symptoms improve (i.e., the medication is highly effective), yet the algorithm would categorize the biologic as "not effective."…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although higher-dose or dose-escalating treatment did not show statistically better efficacy than standard-dose treatment in several clinical trials 2,4,5,21 , nonresponders at standard-dose treatment have been reported to respond to early dose-escalating treatment 13,22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%