2007
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.12.3141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients: A Trend Toward More Aggressive Surgical Treatment

Abstract: The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the United States more than doubled within the recent 6-year period of our study. Prospective studies are needed to understand the decision-making processes that have led to more aggressive breast cancer surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
400
5
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 607 publications
(439 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
22
400
5
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Mastectomy rates did not vary by diagnostic year in the present study. This is in contrast to results from U.S. SEER data that indicate a continuing decline in mastectomy rates from 2000 but with the possibility of an upturn during 2005(Fisher et al, 1995Tuttle et al, 2007;Katipamula et al, 2009;Dragun et al, 2012a;2012b). This was supported by some regional and institutional data from the U.S. and evidently was influenced by an upturn in contra-lateral prophylactic mastectomies (Tuttle et al, 2007;Katipamula et al, 2009;Dragun et al, 2012a;2012b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mastectomy rates did not vary by diagnostic year in the present study. This is in contrast to results from U.S. SEER data that indicate a continuing decline in mastectomy rates from 2000 but with the possibility of an upturn during 2005(Fisher et al, 1995Tuttle et al, 2007;Katipamula et al, 2009;Dragun et al, 2012a;2012b). This was supported by some regional and institutional data from the U.S. and evidently was influenced by an upturn in contra-lateral prophylactic mastectomies (Tuttle et al, 2007;Katipamula et al, 2009;Dragun et al, 2012a;2012b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Statement and reviews of evidence from randomized trials (Abrams et al, 1995;Fisher et al, 1995), mastectomy rates declined markedly in the U.S. (Lazovich et al, 1991;Lazovich et al, 1997;Habermann et al, 2010), Canada, (Gaudette et al, 2004) European countries, (Zorzi et al, 2006), although with a more recent upturn suggested in some North American localities (Tuttle et al, 2007;Katipamula et al, 2009;Dragun et al, 2012a;2012b). Australian data also showed a trend away from mastectomy towards breast conserving surgery both nationally and in a number of jurisdictions (Hill et al, 1990;1994;Byrne et al, 1993;South Australian Cancer Registry, 2000;Cuncins-Hearn et al, 2006;Kricker, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the perception was that a bilateral mastectomy would reduce breast cancer recurrence. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy greatly lowers the risk of developing cancer in the healthy breast, but there is no evidence of an increase in overall survival as an outcome (Tuttle, Habermann, Grund, Morris, Virnig 2007).The risk of systemic metastases from the primary cancer often exceeds the risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer (Yi, Meric-Bernstam, Middleton, Arun, Bedrosian, Babiera et al 2009). It is not clear from the interview data if women understood the recurrence risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is chosen for patients with unilateral breast cancer to prevent possible cancer in the opposite breast. [6][7][8] The procedure does not offer a survival benefit but is performed for local control of breast cancer, to reduce risk and to provide symmetry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%