2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.06.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental clustering of sonar images using self-organizing maps combined with fuzzy adaptive resonance theory

Abstract: International audienceIn this paper we introduce a new unsupervised segmentation algorithm for textured sonar images. A Dynamic Self-Organizing Maps (DSOM) algorithm capable of incremental learning has been developed to automatically cluster the input data into relevant classes of seabed. DSOM algorithm is an extension of classical Self Organizing Maps (SOM) algorithm combined with Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) technique. The proposed approach is based on growing map size during learning processes. Starting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weights are updated by minimizing the loss function to obtain the optimal weight parameters of the network. The optimal weight parameters are obtained from the mean square error loss function as shown in equation (2).…”
Section: Loss Function and Its Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weights are updated by minimizing the loss function to obtain the optimal weight parameters of the network. The optimal weight parameters are obtained from the mean square error loss function as shown in equation (2).…”
Section: Loss Function and Its Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low resolution and severe speckle noise of sonar images, it is difficult to achieve accurate segmentation by ordinary image segmentation methods [1]. At present, there are many sonar image segmentation methods, such as clustering method [2], edge detection method [3], Markov Random Filed method [4] and combining with specific mathematical theory methods [5,6]. However, these methods have poor anti-speckle noise capabilities and cannot achieve automatic segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification methods (e.g., support vector machine (SVM) [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], neural networks [28][29][30]) are supervised learning techniques that involve manually annotated examples in a training step. Supervised learning highly depends on the quality of the training set (number of training examples, labeling samples [27,28,[31][32][33][34][35][36]), besides a tedious task of annotating data by a human. On the other hand, clustering approaches do not need training to ultimately label samples, by techniques such as K-means clustering [23,31,[37][38][39][40], Fuzzy C-means [41][42][43][44][45], and other types of clustering [21,33,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised learning highly depends on the quality of the training set (number of training examples, labeling samples [27,28,[31][32][33][34][35][36]), besides a tedious task of annotating data by a human. On the other hand, clustering approaches do not need training to ultimately label samples, by techniques such as K-means clustering [23,31,[37][38][39][40], Fuzzy C-means [41][42][43][44][45], and other types of clustering [21,33,46]. However, clustering schemes are important in terms of computation requirements and similarity measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics greatly influence feature extraction and image recognition. Researchers used various methods to pre-process the SSS images and studied traditional segmentation algorithms [7,8,9,10] to process them. While it achieves certain results, the process is time consuming and the accuracy remains relatively low [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%