1998
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental cost of department-wide implementation of a picture archiving and communication system and computed radiography.

Abstract: Full PACS-CR implementation would not provide cost savings for a large, subspecialized department. However, institutions that are committed to CR implementation (for whom CR implementation would represent a sunk cost) or institutions that are able to archive images by using image compression will experience cost savings from PACS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 However, in conversations with colleagues at other institutions with PACS already installed, there are few sites that are entirely ®lmless. A problem area seems to be diculty in the transition to ®lmless operations by outpatient clinics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, in conversations with colleagues at other institutions with PACS already installed, there are few sites that are entirely ®lmless. A problem area seems to be diculty in the transition to ®lmless operations by outpatient clinics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PACS offers the advantages of superior speed of image and radiological report dissemination, parallel viewing anywhere in a large hospital or its remote subsidiary clinics, fewer lost or misplaced images, compact storage, avoidance of environmental unsafe chemicals associated with film processing, and the intangible benefits associated with faster clinical management of patients. On the negative side PACS, in the past, has generally been associated with increased costs a compared with operating a screen-film library 6 , although other observers have claimed that it was economically viable 7 . In any event, with the plummeting cost of computer hardware and much improved image transmission speeds, PACS is much more viable now than ever before.…”
Section: General Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exciting concept of a 'film-less' hospital has many benefits for patient care including decreased exposure to radiation, no loss of images and lower rates of rejection [1][2][3] (Table I). Digital imaging may not initially realise cost benefits, 4,5 but advances in technology will rapidly facilitate this. The picture archiving and communication system (PACS) allows the viewing of pictures at diagnostic, consultation and remote computer workstations and the archiving of images on to magnetic or optical media using shortor long-term storage devices.…”
Section: From the Royal Infirmary Of Edinburgh Scotlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical chest radiograph can be 10 Megabytes (Mb) and each slice of a CT or MR image can be about 1 Mb. A large radiology department can produce around 120 Gigabytes (Gb) per day 5 and could be required to store many terabytes (1000 Gb). The small numbers of images which would be in current use or required immediately can be stored in a fast access system.…”
Section: Digital Archive and Backupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation