2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental fatigue damage modeling of 7050-T7 aluminum alloy at stress-raisers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two HCF models, namely the original continuous-time model by Ottosen et al [38] and the modified version by Lindström [31], Lindström et al [33], are tested for this aluminum alloy. The fatigue parameters for the aluminum alloy fitted from Ottosen et al [38] are S 0 = 113.3 MPa, a = [1, 0.2611] T , C = 0.504, K = 5.11E − 6 and L = 2.556, while the parameters from Lindström et al [33] are C = 10, a = [501, 180] T , K = 4.09E − 6, L = 12.9 and A 22 = −12700, while the other components in A are zero. load is applied for compliance evaluation, while in the second case, a load history F (t) = F S f (t) with F = 200 N is applied for fatigue evaluation.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Two HCF models, namely the original continuous-time model by Ottosen et al [38] and the modified version by Lindström [31], Lindström et al [33], are tested for this aluminum alloy. The fatigue parameters for the aluminum alloy fitted from Ottosen et al [38] are S 0 = 113.3 MPa, a = [1, 0.2611] T , C = 0.504, K = 5.11E − 6 and L = 2.556, while the parameters from Lindström et al [33] are C = 10, a = [501, 180] T , K = 4.09E − 6, L = 12.9 and A 22 = −12700, while the other components in A are zero. load is applied for compliance evaluation, while in the second case, a load history F (t) = F S f (t) with F = 200 N is applied for fatigue evaluation.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the HCF model by Ottosen et al [38], the obtained mass of the optimized beam is 0.0046 kg, as shown in Figure 9(a). Using a different HCF model proposed by Lindström [31], Lindström et al [33], the obtained mass of the optimized beam is 0.0047 kg, as shown in Figure 9(b). Both optimized profiles have a smooth radius at the reentrant corner to avoid high stress concentrations and thus prolong the component's life.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations