2007
DOI: 10.1002/net.20168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental flow

Abstract: This paper defines an incremental version of the maximum flow problem. In this model, the capacities increase over time and the resulting solution is a sequence of flows that build on each other incrementally. Thus far, incremental problems considered in the literature have been built on NP-complete problems. To the best of our knowledge, our results are the first to find a polynomial time problem whose incremental version is NP-complete. We present approximation algorithms and hardness results for many versio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hartline and Sharp [18] considered an incremental variant of the maximum flow problem where capacities increase over time. This is in contrast to our framework where the cardinality of the solution increases.…”
Section: Theorem 2 For Every Cardinality Constrained Problem With a Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartline and Sharp [18] considered an incremental variant of the maximum flow problem where capacities increase over time. This is in contrast to our framework where the cardinality of the solution increases.…”
Section: Theorem 2 For Every Cardinality Constrained Problem With a Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The session "Flows, Cuts, and Connectivity" contained one paper describing the problem of finding two-connected orientations of graphs [64], another describing two problems related to q-route flows [65], and a third one on multilateral networks [120]. A fourth session "Flows and Cuts" contained papers on the maximum congested cut problem [104], on the quickest flow problem [81], and on a hierarchical version of the maximum flow problem [56].…”
Section: The Session "Designing Network With Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We executed GRASP on the unweighted dataset, for a varying number of iterations per edge weight update (more iterations mean higher runtime, and a higher likelihood of identifying more dense subgraphs), and measured its runtime, and recall (fraction of output-dense subgraphs that it identified, excluding disconnected subgraphs, which it does not produce). We limited GRASP to searching for subgraphs of cardinalities up to Nmax = 5, and normalized the runtime of GRASP to the runtime of DYNDENS for the same parameters 18 (i.e. the normalized runtime of DYNDENS is 1).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The average (over the values of all other parameters tested) standard deviation of varying α ∈ (0, 1) was 4%, and the median standard deviation was 1%. 18 For DYNDENS we selected a reasonable value of δit, given the values of the rest of the parameters. the number of recomputations that BASELINE was able to perform, given the same time as DYNDENS took for the entire dataset Even given the above restricted problem setting, we observed that BASELINE was generally not up to the task of realtime story identification.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation