2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlamp.2015.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental model checking of delta-oriented software product lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different formalisms for representing variability models [20,2]. Classen et al [4] present Featured Transition Systems (FTSs), which are today widely accepted as the model essentially sufficient for most purposes of lifted model checking.…”
Section: Related Work and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different formalisms for representing variability models [20,2]. Classen et al [4] present Featured Transition Systems (FTSs), which are today widely accepted as the model essentially sufficient for most purposes of lifted model checking.…”
Section: Related Work and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of research on customizing model-checking techniques for SPLs. Like our FTS-based proposals [19,20], the CCS-based proposals PL-CCS [2,10] and DeltaCCS [12] are grounded in the μ-calculus. In [26], PL-CCS was proven to be less expressive (in terms of the sets of definable products) than FTSs, while DeltaCCS allows only limited familybased model checking (viz.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make SPL models amenable to family-based reasoning, feature-based variability was introduced in many behavioral models, e.g. based on process calculi [2,[10][11][12] and labeled transition systems (LTSs) [3,[13][14][15]. Arguably the most widely used behavioral SPL models are featured transition systems (FTSs) [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations