2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02418-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental value of plaque enhancement in predicting stroke recurrence in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 In our study, patients with recurrent-stroke events had larger culprit plaques (measured by plaque volume) than those with first-time stroke events. No significant difference in other culprit plaque features such as the degree of stenosis, 4 plaque enhancement, 12,32 and plaque burden 13 was detected between the 2 groups, which was also reported by a recent similar study. 16 Plaque burden 13 and its progression with time 33 were reported to be associated with stroke recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…31 In our study, patients with recurrent-stroke events had larger culprit plaques (measured by plaque volume) than those with first-time stroke events. No significant difference in other culprit plaque features such as the degree of stenosis, 4 plaque enhancement, 12,32 and plaque burden 13 was detected between the 2 groups, which was also reported by a recent similar study. 16 Plaque burden 13 and its progression with time 33 were reported to be associated with stroke recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…5 Several recent studies also demonstrated that culprit plaque enhancement or enhancement ratio was related to recurrent stroke. 12,13,32 Our study quantitatively analyzed the culprit enhancement ratio but did not get a similar result. Instead of culprit plaque enhancement, our study indicated that the patients with recurrent-stroke events had more enhanced plaques, which might indicate more vulnerable plaques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stroke recurrence in ICAS is related to various factors, such as plaque burden, plaque inflammation, infarction pattern, collateral status, etc. (Kim et al, 2016 ; Wabnitz et al, 2019 ; Song et al, 2020 ). Plaque burden and plaque enhancement are independent risk factors for stroke recurrence, and a greater degree of stenosis is associated with a higher risk of recurrence (Ran et al, 2020 ; Shi et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can not only accurately assess the degree of vascular luminal stenosis but also provide the size and composition information of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque (ICAP), including the detection of intra-plaque hemorrhage, plaque enhancement, vascular wall remodeling, and plaque distribution, etc., with extremely high repeatability [8,9] . In previous studies, ICAP features based on HR-VWI, including positive remodeling, intraplaque hemorrhage, and plaque enhancement, have been identi ed as markers of future stroke risks [10][11][12] . In this study, we focused on the relationship between plaque characteristics and stroke types in sICAS patients undergoing HR-VWI examination and followed up the patients to assess the differences in clinical risk factors and ICAP characteristics between patients with and without recurrent stroke, with the hope to identify novel intervention targets to develop more standardized secondary prevention strategies for ischemic stroke and TIA to reduce stroke recurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%