2014
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70147-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incretin therapies and risk of hospital admission for acute pancreatitis in an unselected population of European patients with type 2 diabetes: a case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That study was restricted to individuals younger than 65 years of age (~60% of our study population was in this age group), who had no data on liraglutide use but only sitagliptin and exenatide use (which were used by 65% of incretin users in our data set), and included no confounder data on other pancreatitis-related drugs. In another recent, population-based case-control analysis in Piedmont, Italy, Giorda et al (25) found that current use of incretins versus other antihyperglycemic drugs was not associated with acute pancreatitis (adjusted OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.69-1.38]), which is consistent with our result. Compared with Singh et al (24), Giorda et al (25) examined all types of incretins, and used population-based data on unselected patients of all ages, similar to our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That study was restricted to individuals younger than 65 years of age (~60% of our study population was in this age group), who had no data on liraglutide use but only sitagliptin and exenatide use (which were used by 65% of incretin users in our data set), and included no confounder data on other pancreatitis-related drugs. In another recent, population-based case-control analysis in Piedmont, Italy, Giorda et al (25) found that current use of incretins versus other antihyperglycemic drugs was not associated with acute pancreatitis (adjusted OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.69-1.38]), which is consistent with our result. Compared with Singh et al (24), Giorda et al (25) examined all types of incretins, and used population-based data on unselected patients of all ages, similar to our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These studies include several cohort analyses from the U.S. (20)(21)(22) and U.K. (23). In contrast, a casecontrol study in the U.S. reported an adjusted OR of 2.24 (95% CI 1.36-3.68) for acute pancreatitis (24) associated with the use of exenatide or sitagliptin, while another Italian case-control study (25) reported an adjusted OR of 0.98 (95% CI 0.69-1.38). Thus, the issue of the relationship of incretins and acute pancreatitis remains under debate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concerns have been corroborated by reports from adverse event databases (4,5), although such analyses have well-known limitations. In contrast, the observational studies conducted to date have been conflicting and inconclusive (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Dwilliam T Cefalu Editor In Chief Diabetes Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study also suggested that pancreatic findings attributed to incretin-based therapies in rodents are commonly observed background findings, without any drug treatment and independent of diet or glycemic status [110] . Moreover large retrospective population studies and recent metaanalysis suggested a negative association of incretinbased therapies with either pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer [111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120] . Recently the FDA reevaluated more than 250 toxicology studies, organized in nearly 18000 healthy animals, and found no association with pancreatitis or any pancreatic toxicity.…”
Section: Safety Of Incretin-based Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%