2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913052117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incubation periods impact the spatial predictability of cholera and Ebola outbreaks in Sierra Leone

Abstract: Forecasting the spatiotemporal spread of infectious diseases during an outbreak is an important component of epidemic response. However, it remains challenging both methodologically and with respect to data requirements, as disease spread is influenced by numerous factors, including the pathogen’s underlying transmission parameters and epidemiological dynamics, social networks and population connectivity, and environmental conditions. Here, using data from Sierra Leone, we analyze the spatiotemporal dynamics o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transmission started with a seed case(s) which generated secondary cases from a negative binomial distribution Z~NegB(R E , k) with a mean equivalent to the reproduction number (R E , 2.5 [13,30], reflecting early and high transmission potential among an unvaccinated population) and heterogeneity introduced by a dispersion parameter (k, 4.5, reflecting low overdispersion in R E ) [31]. Each new infection drew a time of infection from a serial interval distribution Sg amma(shape = 0.5, rate = 0.1) with a median of 5 days [4,13,32]. We assumed that at the time of outbreak detection there were 3 seed cases and that all resulting infectious persons were symptomatic.…”
Section: Branching Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transmission started with a seed case(s) which generated secondary cases from a negative binomial distribution Z~NegB(R E , k) with a mean equivalent to the reproduction number (R E , 2.5 [13,30], reflecting early and high transmission potential among an unvaccinated population) and heterogeneity introduced by a dispersion parameter (k, 4.5, reflecting low overdispersion in R E ) [31]. Each new infection drew a time of infection from a serial interval distribution Sg amma(shape = 0.5, rate = 0.1) with a median of 5 days [4,13,32]. We assumed that at the time of outbreak detection there were 3 seed cases and that all resulting infectious persons were symptomatic.…”
Section: Branching Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods which account for uncertainty in human mobility and resulting disease dynamics therefore become especially important in order to make robust inferences about spatial transmission. For example, Kahn et al 69 showed that pathogens with longer incubation periods have patterns of spatial spread that are less predictable, which has important implications for vaccination campaigns. While the authors did not explicitly look at trip duration and network topology as we do here, these results lend support to our findings that the biological properties of pathogens that determine their speed of spatial propagation interact with the travel behavior of humans in a pathogen-specific manner, and suggests that this general relationship may be more widely applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To contain an outbreak, early detection of suspected cases is critical 17 . Some studies have described that a longer incubation period may be beneficial for epidemic control 18 , as this allows the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to have more time to deal with the overall epidemic. This conclusion may be more applicable to some known diseases, but for unknown diseases, we believe that a longer incubation period represents a more dangerous signal, making the development of the epidemic uncontrollable 18,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%