2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indel markers: Genetic diversity of 38 polymorphisms in Brazilian populations and application in a paternity investigation with post mortem material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Panama and Southeast Brazil are those with the highest values (PD is 0.9999999999999995 and 0.9999999999999990, respectively; PE is 0.9987 and 0.9979, respectively). Previous reports using the same 38 indel set as in this study showed very similar results in population samples from Brazil, Portugal, and Spain [8,31,32].…”
Section: Forensically Relevant Parameterssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Panama and Southeast Brazil are those with the highest values (PD is 0.9999999999999995 and 0.9999999999999990, respectively; PE is 0.9987 and 0.9979, respectively). Previous reports using the same 38 indel set as in this study showed very similar results in population samples from Brazil, Portugal, and Spain [8,31,32].…”
Section: Forensically Relevant Parameterssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The samples from Alagoas and Santa Isabel were selected from previous research projects belonging to healthy unrelated individuals used as controls in association studies, which involved the State hospitals as well as the Federal University of Alagoas and the Research Institute FIOCRUZ (Oswaldo Cruz Foundation). The Terena samples were those previously included in Manta et al [22]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are widely distributed throughout the genome and derived from single mutation events which occur at a very low frequency. Moreover, some of them might be informative as ancestry markers since they may display significant allele frequency differences among geographically separated populations, whereas others might be a complement in human identification tests [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%