2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
324
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
324
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Goebel et al (2006) compared self-organizing group ICA (Esposito et al, 2005) with GLM on a sentence repetition task using fMRI, and concluded that group ICA provided a functional connectivity model by separating different patterns from the data. In another study that used subject-wise concatenation group ICA (Calhoun et al, 2001b) on a series of complex natural environment (Malinen et al, 2007), it was found that the GLM method only revealed sub-areas of the ICArevealed activations.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ica and Glm Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Goebel et al (2006) compared self-organizing group ICA (Esposito et al, 2005) with GLM on a sentence repetition task using fMRI, and concluded that group ICA provided a functional connectivity model by separating different patterns from the data. In another study that used subject-wise concatenation group ICA (Calhoun et al, 2001b) on a series of complex natural environment (Malinen et al, 2007), it was found that the GLM method only revealed sub-areas of the ICArevealed activations.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ica and Glm Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases with more than two decompositions, clustering techniques or similar tools are necessary (Esposito et al, 2005;van de Ven et al, 2007).…”
Section: Selection Of Components Of Interest In Icamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…assuming shared time courses/weights, but unique components) was proposed in Svensen et al [2002] and both were compared in Schmithorst and Holland [2004]. Alternative approaches assuming both shared and unique components [Lukic et al, 2002], clustering single-subject results [Esposito et al, 2005], or stacking into a cube via tensorial methods [Beckmann and Smith, 2005] have also been proposed. All of the approaches just mentioned utilize the entire multisubject spatiotemporal data set from a single task in various ways.…”
Section: Shared Participant Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2004; Esposito et al. 2005). These procedures can provide satisfying results for healthy subjects or in pathologies with a marginal effect on network spatial patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%