2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2003.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise?

Abstract: Many sources of fluctuation contribute to the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal, complicating attempts to infer those changes that are truly related to brain activation. Unlike methods of analysis of fMRI data that test the time course of each voxel against a hypothesized waveform, data-driven methods, such as independent component analysis and clustering, attempt to find common features within the data. This exploratory approach can be revealing when the brain activation is difficult to pred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
270
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 371 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
270
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We see a major utility for parallel ICA in this context as it provides the means to disentangle and visualize these networks both in their spatial and temporal form (Calhoun, et al, 2006a;Debener, et al, 2006;Makeig, et al, 2004a;McKeown, et al, 2003;Onton, et al, 2006). However, some limitations apply: Infomax assumes sources to have non-normal, either superor subgaussian distributions (Bell, et al, 1995;Lee, et al, 1999), and this seems to hold for a great variety of physiological signals as well as technical artefacts.…”
Section: Area Of Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We see a major utility for parallel ICA in this context as it provides the means to disentangle and visualize these networks both in their spatial and temporal form (Calhoun, et al, 2006a;Debener, et al, 2006;Makeig, et al, 2004a;McKeown, et al, 2003;Onton, et al, 2006). However, some limitations apply: Infomax assumes sources to have non-normal, either superor subgaussian distributions (Bell, et al, 1995;Lee, et al, 1999), and this seems to hold for a great variety of physiological signals as well as technical artefacts.…”
Section: Area Of Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scalp EEG samples a volume-conducted, spatially degraded version of the responses, where the potential at any location and latency can be considered a mixture of multiple independent timecourses that stem from large-scale synchronous field potentials (Makeig, et al, 2004a;Onton, et al, 2006). Similarly, the neurovascular transformation of the distributed neuronal activity into hemodynamic signals (Lauritzen, et al, 2003;Logothetis, 2003) affords detection of blood oxygenation level dependent responses (BOLD, Ogawa, et al, 1990) that are temporally degraded and spatially mixed across the fMRI volume (Calhoun, et al, 2006a;McKeown, et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since this technique removes only the average timeseries, it is unable to account for voxel-specific phase differences in the noise due to physiological fluctuations. Additionally, component based techniques, utilizing independent component analysis (ICA) or principal components analysis (PCA), have shown potential in identifying spatial and temporal patterns of structured noise (Thomas et al 2002;McKeown et al 2003;Beckmann and Smith 2004). However, the utility of component based methods has been limited to BOLD studies with sampling times short enough to clearly differentiate cardiac and respiratory elements from evoked responses (Thomas et al 2002), in which case a temporal band pass filter would be adequate for noise removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICA model assumes that the data are linear mixtures of statistically independent sources and attempts to decompose the data into maximally independent components and their mixing coefficients (also called loading parameters). The ICA method is being increasingly utilized for fMRI data analysis to reveal hidden structure in the spatial and temporal dimensions of these data [Calhoun et al, 2003;McKeown et al, 2003]. In contrast to a first-level ICA approach (i.e., analysis of the preprocessing fMRI time series data for each task and each subject separately), we instead introduce the idea of a second-level (group), feature-based analysis of the fMRI activation maps (the "features") generated from a first-level analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%