2015
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independent evolution of the sexes promotes amphibian diversification

Abstract: Classic ecological theory predicts that the evolution of sexual dimorphism constrains diversification by limiting morphospace available for speciation. Alternatively, sexual selection may lead to the evolution of reproductive isolation and increased diversification. We test contrasting predictions of these hypotheses by examining the relationship between sexual dimorphism and diversification in amphibians. Our analysis shows that the evolution of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is associated with increased divers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, our interest here is in correctly estimating diversification rates of clades (e.g., higher taxa), both large and small, as in many empirical studies (e.g., Adams et al. ; De Lise and Rowe ; Puttick et al. ; Wiens ,b; Cooney et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, our interest here is in correctly estimating diversification rates of clades (e.g., higher taxa), both large and small, as in many empirical studies (e.g., Adams et al. ; De Lise and Rowe ; Puttick et al. ; Wiens ,b; Cooney et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Rabosky et al. ), sexual‐size dimorphism (De Lisle and Rowe ), herbivory (e.g., Price et al. ; Wiens et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study on fossil ostracod species also presented evidence for elevated extinction risk following the evolution of male‐biased size and shape sexual dimorphism (Martins et al, ). Conversely, in a study of over 700 amphibian species, taxa with female‐biased sexual size dimorphism had reduced extinction risk, higher species richness and an increased diversification rate (Lisle & Rowe, ). This is consistent with a positive link between female fitness and population fitness in an experimental laboratory study of beetles (Berger et al, ).…”
Section: Eco‐evolutionary Feedbacks From Sexual Selection and Sexual mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At macroevolutionary time-scales, the only known study (De Lisle & Rowe, 2015) presented robust evidence rejecting the core prediction that lineage diversification rates decay with increasing sexual dimorphism. At macroevolutionary time-scales, the only known study (De Lisle & Rowe, 2015) presented robust evidence rejecting the core prediction that lineage diversification rates decay with increasing sexual dimorphism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The proliferation of sexually dimorphic species is predicted to saturate morphospace, thus increasingly limiting the opportunities for lineages to radiate adaptively via niche filling (De Lisle & Rowe, 2015;Losos, 2009;Schoener, 1977). The proliferation of sexually dimorphic species is predicted to saturate morphospace, thus increasingly limiting the opportunities for lineages to radiate adaptively via niche filling (De Lisle & Rowe, 2015;Losos, 2009;Schoener, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%