1985
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90289-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independent replication of cowpea mosaic virus bottom component RNA: In vivo instability of the viral RNAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, with probes spanning different regions of RNA1 or RNA2, no specific signal corresponding to minus-strand RNA was observed (data not shown). This suggests that in CPMV-infected protoplasts, minus-strand RNA accumulates much less than does plus-strand RNA, a suggestion in line with earlier findings obtained in Northern hybridization studies (11).…”
Section: Localization Of Cpmv Rna In Infected Protoplastssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, with probes spanning different regions of RNA1 or RNA2, no specific signal corresponding to minus-strand RNA was observed (data not shown). This suggests that in CPMV-infected protoplasts, minus-strand RNA accumulates much less than does plus-strand RNA, a suggestion in line with earlier findings obtained in Northern hybridization studies (11).…”
Section: Localization Of Cpmv Rna In Infected Protoplastssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Strikingly, almost no fluorescence was present in the cytoplasm at the periphery of the cells, which was the site where the viral particles were shown to accumulate, indicating that only unencapsidated plus-strand RNA hybridizes with the fluorescent probe. It has been shown previously that under conditions that leave viral RNA unprotected by coat protein, the genomic RNA is unstable (11), suggesting that in CPMV-infected cells, the large majority of plus-strand viral RNA is present in viral particles whereas only a small proportion is present as unencapsidated RNA. However, we observed no clear differences in the plus-strand RNA1 signal in protoplasts infected with RNA1 alone and in protoplasts coinfected with RNA2, which encodes the capsid proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property of the interaction between the proteins and the RNA could be related to a protection of the RNA against the degradation by cell ribonucleases. In fact, in the absence of RNA 2 (which codes for the coat proteins), RNA 1 accumulates to a much lower level than it does in a full infection (de Varennes & Maulé, 1985), probably because of its increased turnover when unprotected by the proteins. On the other hand, the irreversibility of the dissociation of the top component leads to the question of how empty capsids can be formed in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the results presented here provide compelling evidence that the suppressor activity of the CPMV S protein requires the C-terminal region, and aa 198-213 in particular. The data explain the debilitation of mutants harbouring deletions in this region (Taylor et al, 1999) and the low level of replication often found when RNA-1 replicates on its own in protoplasts (de Varennes & Maule, 1985). The fact that the native CPMV sequence cannot be functionally substituted by the equivalent region of BPMV also explains the phenotype of the infection caused by pCP-Hybrid and why CPMV chimaeras with the natural C-terminal amino acids replaced by foreign epitopes grow extremely poorly (Taylor, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%