Independent State Health Surveys

Abstract

Context There is high demand for local-level population health data. A national system of state and local data collection would help improve both population health and health care delivery. The primary source of state-level population health data for adults is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. However, many states need data on children and adolescents, racial and ethnic subpopulations, consistent estimates for localities, or more in-depth information on key topics than the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System provides. Eleven state health surveys (SHSs) have emerged in an effort to address these gaps. Design Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted in 2009 with representatives of 9 SHSs. The interviews were recorded, and data were transcribed, organized, and analyzed according to the query structure. This analysis identified (1) the core elements of SHS that have been successful in meeting needs for local data and (2) the processes and strategies used by state officials in creating these surveys. Results Key findings include the following: (1) SHSs provide concrete data on local health issues that meet the needs of policy makers who wish to adopt evidence-based public health policies; (2) data from SHSs allow researchers to identify issues, apply for grants, and evaluate, assess, and track health indicators; (3) a “champion” is required to build the case for a survey and push through barriers to obtain funding and stakeholder buy-in; and (4) SHSs face challenges such as inconsistent funding and lack of uniform standards. Conclusion Opportunities to support SHSs include (1) identifying sustained funding sources; (2) providing technical assistance and facilitating training to foster best practices, quality standards, and comparability across states; and (3) supporting an organization for SHS researchers to share resources, information, and experiences.

Using Population Dose to Evaluate Community-level Health Initiatives

“…9,10 Given these limitations, national, state, or county data are often inadequate to inform work being implemented at a community level. [11][12][13][14] To address these challenges, the population dose methodology was developed and has become fundamental to the work of Kaiser Permanente's CHI, a multisector place-based initiative designed to promote obesity prevention, policy, and environmental change in communities. 15 Although the term "dose" is being used more frequently in public health literature, there is no widely accepted definition of dose or method for dose measurement.…”

A comparison between perceived rurality and established geographic rural status among Indiana residents

“…However, it is important to understand regional variation as it is more likely to capture underlying social constructs than a national sample. [ 49 ] Moreover, the study findings can be interpreted as an addition to a growing body of research focused on individual states, which may be used to complement aggregate results from national surveys.…”

The VicHealth Indicators population survey: methodology, prevalence of behavioural risk factors, and use in local policy

“…Therefore, many states in Australia have their own approach to behavioural risk factor surveillance. This is one of the reasons that state-level surveys have evolved in the USA alongside the BRFSS, that is, to inform planning for the local context and ensure that health data is rapidly available at the smallest geographical level to address health disparities based on factors such as ethnicity and socioeconomic status [ 6 ].…”