2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independent Synthesis Projects in the Organic Chemistry Teaching Laboratories: Bridging the Gap Between Student and Researcher

Abstract: Science educators strive to teach students how to be well-rounded scientists with the ability to problem solve, anticipate errors, and adapt to unexpected roadblocks. Traditional organic chemistry experiments seldom teach these skills, no matter how novel or contemporary the subject material. This paper reports on the success of a quarter-long organic chemistry laboratory experiment that takes the form of a research project designed to teach these real-life skills. Students took a three-step synthetic sequence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
21
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Particular examples in our review came across the implementation of alternative laboratory pedagogy, deploying technologies such as clickers and simulations, , incentivizing engagement through role-playing and the gamification of chemistry concepts. We also identified faculty trying to implement concepts of social justice into chemistry courses . Additional articles cited examined the rationale in promoting subject matter expertise and higher ordered/critical thinking and its effectiveness. Taking an approach similar to that of Kilgour et al we wanted to design our own creative solution toward student engagement targeting the most difficult aspect of Organic Chemistry II, multistep synthesis. We were interested to see if students in organic chemistry could benefit and would improve their retention of key concepts through the use of entrepreneurial role-play to analyze, create and design, and evaluate (critical thinking) key learning objectives in an Organic Chemistry II course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular examples in our review came across the implementation of alternative laboratory pedagogy, deploying technologies such as clickers and simulations, , incentivizing engagement through role-playing and the gamification of chemistry concepts. We also identified faculty trying to implement concepts of social justice into chemistry courses . Additional articles cited examined the rationale in promoting subject matter expertise and higher ordered/critical thinking and its effectiveness. Taking an approach similar to that of Kilgour et al we wanted to design our own creative solution toward student engagement targeting the most difficult aspect of Organic Chemistry II, multistep synthesis. We were interested to see if students in organic chemistry could benefit and would improve their retention of key concepts through the use of entrepreneurial role-play to analyze, create and design, and evaluate (critical thinking) key learning objectives in an Organic Chemistry II course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Courses can extend the learning experience by having students perform a literature search, design the synthetic scheme, and evaluate their performance . A few of these have become much closer to an independent research experience (similar to CUREs) where written reports and presentations are part of the laboratory design . Finally, CUREs have been developed that connect synthesis directly to drug discovery and testing .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commitment of faculty to incorporating synthesis into the curriculum is evident in a large number of multi-step syntheses in Mayo's classic laboratory textbook (5) and the multitude of synthesis experiments found in the literature. These experiments provide a variety of approaches to teaching synthesis in the sophomore organic chemistry curriculum with most of them focusing on the synthesis of a biologically (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) or commercially (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) relevant target while some are designed for pedagogical (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37) reasons. The complexity of the syntheses differ greatly and range from two (6, 7, 11-13, 16, 18, 20, 22, 27, 31, 36), three (8, 10, 14, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 28-30, 34, 37), four (9,26,33,38), five (19,32), six (24,39), and eight (40) step processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%