2020
DOI: 10.4310/cag.2020.v28.n1.a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Index characterization for free boundary minimal surfaces

Abstract: In this paper, we compute the Morse index of a free boundary minimal submanifold from data of two simpler problems. The first is the fixed boundary problem and the second is concered with the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map associated with the Jacobi operator. As an application, we show that the Morse index of a free boundary minimal annulus is equal to 4 if and only if it is the critical catenoid.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [7], this lower bound was improved in the case k = 2, n = 3, and it was shown there that for Σ 2 ⊂ B 3 orientable which is not a flat disk, ind(Σ) ≥ 4 = 3 + 1. Furthermore, this inequality is sharp, since it was proven there that the so-called critical catenoid has index precisely equal to 4 (see also [17], [18]).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [7], this lower bound was improved in the case k = 2, n = 3, and it was shown there that for Σ 2 ⊂ B 3 orientable which is not a flat disk, ind(Σ) ≥ 4 = 3 + 1. Furthermore, this inequality is sharp, since it was proven there that the so-called critical catenoid has index precisely equal to 4 (see also [17], [18]).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Fraser and R. Schoen [8] proved that the index of a non-flat free boundary minimal surface in the unit 3-ball is at least 3; later on, it was shown in [7] that actually the index of such a surface is at least 4. It was shown independently in [7], [17] and [18], that the index of the so-called critical catenoid, a minimal annulus with free boundary in the unit 3-ball introduced by A. Fraser and R. Schoen in [8], is equal to 4. A natural question is then whether the critical catenoid is the unique (up to congruence) free boundary minimal surface in the unit 3-ball with index 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One reason for this is that incredibly powerful complex analytical techniques that apply for surfaces do not seem to carry over to hypersurfaces. Nevertheless, progress continues to be made: see Sargent [21], Ambrozio, Carlotto-Sharp [3], Smith-Stern-Tran-Zhou [23] and Tran [25] for some new index bounds for minimal hypersurfaces with free boundary, Mondino-Spadaro [18] for a new characterisation of free boundary minimal submanifolds, and Li-Zhou [14,15] for far-reaching min-max and regularity theory, including an extension of the classical program of Almgren [1,2] (see Pitts [20] and Schoen-Simon [22] for further classical theory) to the case of minimal hypersurfaces with free boundary, for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1.4. While this article was in preparation, the author has been informed of related works by G. Smith and D. Zhou [18] on the one hand, and by H. Tran [19] on the other, in which the index of the critical catenoid is also computed. Our proof and H. Tran's use the Steklov spectrum of the Jacobi operator, while G. Smith and D. Zhou's use the Robin spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%