Visions of Alterity 2004
DOI: 10.1163/9789004489615_013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ‘divided self’ in Banville’s novels is generally acknowledged to occupy a central place in the writer’s prose but since the main approaches to Banville appear to be grounded in Postmodern theory, psychoanalysis and philosophy, the problem of the ‘divided self’ has so far been treated from one of these theoretical frameworks and has hardly been studied from a stylistic and narratological standpoint. While previous investigations of the topic such as O’Connell’s Winnicottian reading of Banville (2013), D’hoker’s exploration of different ‘visions of alterity’ (2004), or Ghassemi’s research of Banville through the prism of Lacan (2016) have shown many aspects of splitting, their approach to the ‘divided self’ is rather based on an intuitive interpretation and not on linguistic evidence. Yet, a linguistic exploration of a literary work is extremely beneficial as it opens new perspectives for interpretation and contributes to our understanding of a text.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ‘divided self’ in Banville’s novels is generally acknowledged to occupy a central place in the writer’s prose but since the main approaches to Banville appear to be grounded in Postmodern theory, psychoanalysis and philosophy, the problem of the ‘divided self’ has so far been treated from one of these theoretical frameworks and has hardly been studied from a stylistic and narratological standpoint. While previous investigations of the topic such as O’Connell’s Winnicottian reading of Banville (2013), D’hoker’s exploration of different ‘visions of alterity’ (2004), or Ghassemi’s research of Banville through the prism of Lacan (2016) have shown many aspects of splitting, their approach to the ‘divided self’ is rather based on an intuitive interpretation and not on linguistic evidence. Yet, a linguistic exploration of a literary work is extremely beneficial as it opens new perspectives for interpretation and contributes to our understanding of a text.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%