Index of interdisciplinary collaboration

Bronstein, Laura R.

doi:10.1093/swr/26.2.113

Cited by 123 publications

(113 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

106

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…3.5 Les obstacles à la mise en oeuvre du projet Toutefois, il devient pratiquement impossible, pour les professionnels d'une seule discipline, de répondre à l'ensemble des problèmes individuels, familiaux, institutionnels ou collectifs. Dans un tel contexte, la collaboration interprofessionnelle devient une solution permettant de parvenir aux objectifs, ne pouvant être atteints par les fonctions d'un seul professionnel (Bronstein, 2002). Au Québec, dans l'intervention auprès des victimes d'actes criminels, cette collaboration implique souvent la présence d'intervenants sociaux et de policiers.…”

Section: Sommaireunclassified

Étude exploratoire sur l'implantation, la mise en oeuvre et les retombées du "Projet de référence policière" par différents acteurs du CAVAC Saguenay Lac-Saint-Jean et de la Sûreté du Québec MRC du Fjord du Saguenay /

Villeneuve¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SOMMAIRETous les jours, au Québec, plusieurs individus sont victimes de crimes contre la personne ou contre les biens. Ainsi, ces hommes et ces femmes peuvent avoir subi de la violence physique, psychologique, verbale, économique ou sexuelle. Ces événements engendrent, chez ces victimes, de nombreuses conséquences, telles que : (a) des blessures, des maladies ou des souffrances physiques, (b) des atteintes psychologiques ou des problèmes de santé mentale ou (c) des conséquences sociales affectant la vie de celles-ci. Parallèlement à cela, ces personnes doivent prendre une décision importante, soit celle de dénoncer ou non l'événement vécu aux policiers. Cette dénonciation peut représenter l'entrée du dossier policier dans le système de justice criminelle. Cependant, cette dénonciation ne permet pas nécessairement aux victimes d'accéder aux ressources pouvant leur venir en aide. Afin d'améliorer l'accès aux services disponibles pour les victimes d'actes criminels, le «Projet de référence policière » a été mis sur pied, en mai 2010. Ce projet avait pour objectif de resserrer le partenariat entre le Centre d'aide aux victimes d'actes criminels (CAVAC) et la Sûreté du Québec (SQ) dans la région du Saguenay-LacSaint-Jean. Depuis son implantation, l'objectif général de ce projet-pilote est de diminuer le délai entre l'intervention du CAVAC et le crime, afin d'offrir des services pouvant répondre aux besoins des victimes.Afin de présenter le point de vue de divers acteurs du CAVAC et de la SQ quant à l'implantation, la mise en oeuvre et les retombées de ce projet-pilote, cette recherche qualitative s'est réalisée en trois volets, soit : (a) une entrevue individuelle, abordant l'implantation et la mise en oeuvre du « Projet de référence policière », (b) une entrevue de groupe, soulevant les retombées de ce projet et (c) la consultation de la documentation fournie par le CAVAC et la SQ. Pour le premier volet, neuf personnes ont été rencontrées, il s'agit : d'intervenantes sociales du CAVAC (n=7), de la directrice de cet organisme (n=l), de même que de la responsable du projet-pilote à la SQ (n=l). En ce qui concerne l'entrevue de groupe, huit intervenantes sociales du CAVAC ont participé à celle-ci.. Finalement, la documentation transmise par la SQ et le CAVAC a été utilisée pour approfondir et mettre en contexte les résultats.Privilégiant une perspective bioécologique, ce mémoire expose les caractéristiques environnementales ayant facilité ou entravé l'implantation et la mise en oeuvre du projetpilote entre juillet 2010 et novembre 2011. Pour ce faire, un portrait de l'implantation du projet est d'abord dressé, à la lumière de la documentation produite par les différents partenaires et du discours des acteurs impliqués. Dans un deuxième temps, les résultats associés à l'exploration de la mise en oeuvre du projet permettent de faire un parallèle entre les changements attendus à la suite de son implantation et ceux qui ont été concrètement observés en matière de prestation de services. Finalement, les retombées du projet-...

show abstract

Section: Sommaireunclassified

Étude exploratoire sur l'implantation, la mise en oeuvre et les retombées du "Projet de référence policière" par différents acteurs du CAVAC Saguenay Lac-Saint-Jean et de la Sûreté du Québec MRC du Fjord du Saguenay /

Villeneuve¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Obviously, sport scientists need to work with coaches and athletes to test their ideas, so reciprocity might help both partners increase legitimacy (assuming the collaboration will produce research outputs and winning performances), resulting in greater stability and efficiency. The necessity motive is best understood in the context of this study as the extent to which the acquisition and implementation of knowledge by high performance coaches is an expectation of their professional role (Bronstein, 2002).…”

Section: Collaborative Advantagementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two final overarching motives for collaboration were defined by Bronstein (2002). These are the need for interdependence of the individuals in the relationship and the collective ownership of goals.…”

Section: Collaborative Advantagementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Personal characteristics Bronstein (2002) identified factors that influence the success of a collaborative process including personal characteristics and structural characteristics. She summarized the work of Mattesich and Monsey (1992), Abramson and Mizrahi (1996), and Brown (1995) in developing the personal characteristics component of her model.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Successful Collaborative Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Collaboration Model for Knowledge Transfer from Sport Science to High Performance Canadian Interuniversity Coaches

Reade

2009

Journal of Coaching Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the extent to which improved collaboration between sport scientists and coaches of high performance athletes might improve knowledge transfer in sport. The research includes a review of the extant literature on collaboration to develop a model of successful collaborative practice. The model is then empirically tested to determine whether such a model can improve our knowledge of the mechanisms for effective knowledge transfer in sport. To accomplish our purpose, we interviewed 38 high performance coaches employed in a variety of university settings and from a variety of sports to determine the factors that inhibit and facilitate, knowledge transfer. The model was used to guide the data analysis. The results showed that 14 of the coaches interviewed were involved in collaborative relationships with sport scientists and the factors in the model did help to explain why some coaches collaborate while other coaches may not. Factors such as different types of motivation, the personal characteristics of the coach and the structural characteristics within which the coach operates seemed to influence the extent of the collaboration between the sport scientist and the coach and ultimately the effective transfer of sport science knowledge. Sport organizations can apply these findings to improve the effectiveness of knowledge transfer to coaches of high performance athletes. Journal of Coaching Education A Collaboration Model for Knowledge Transfer from Sport Science to High Performance Canadian Interuniversity CoachesSport scientists create important knowledge for coach education and athlete development but concern has been expressed (Williams & Kendall, 2007) over whether this knowledge is being transferred to the coaches that most need it; the coaches of high performance athletes. Consequently, there is increasing research interest concerning knowledge transfer processes in high performance sport. Knowledge transfer traditionally refers to the extent to which research or evidence-based knowledge (Bzdel, Wither & Graham, 2004) is effectively applied in practice.The main question underpinning knowledge transfer research is how to get the research (or evidence) effectively into the hands of the practitioner.It is well established that the perceived inaccessibility of research or science by coaches is a barrier to knowledge transfer in sport (Cushion, Armour & Jones, 2003; Reade, Rodgers & Spriggs, 2008; Reade, Rodgers & Hall, 2008). Gilbert and Trudel (2004) reported the difficulty for coaches to "access and realize the potential of coaching research" and for "coach educators to integrate the full scope of coaching research into the development of coach training programs" (p. 398). Relatedly, coaching science has been criticized for its lack of impact on coaching practice (Abraham & Collins, 1998). However, in the context of a national sport institute, Williams and Kendall (2007) found that coaches and researchers did share common perspectives of the types of knowledge needed, suggesting that a...

show abstract

“…Furthermore, a growing number of researchers are studying collaboration, integrated services, or some combination (Lawson, 2004;Bronstein, 2002;Gil de Gibaja, 2001;Hassett & Austin, 1997). At the same time, college and university courses focused on collaboration, integrated services, and coordinated services appear to be increasing.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

An Intervention Framework for Collaboration

Claiborne

Lawson

2005

Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Service

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A growing number of specialized human service professionals and their organizations are changing their relations with each other. These new relations are focused on a variety of new linkages, interchanges, transactions, and exchanges, and they share common features. For example, all tend to be lumped together as "a collaborative approach." And all derive from a dual awareness. Standalone professionals and agencies are ill equipped to meet cooccurring and interlocking human needs, and these professionals and agencies fundamentally depend on each other to achieve results.Reflecting these new relations, terms such as interprofessional collaboration, interorganizational collaboration, family centered, collaboration, community collaboration, and service integration, enjoy increasing popularity among planners, policy makers, and practitioners. Furthermore, a growing number of researchers are studying collaboration, integrated services, or some combination (Lawson, 2004;Bronstein, 2002;Gil de Gibaja, 2001;Hassett & Austin, 1997). At the same time, college and university courses focused on collaboration, integrated services, and coordinated services appear to be increasing.In brief, multiple changes are underway in diverse parts of the United States and elsewhere in the world. Where social and health service professionals and their agencies are concerned, an overarching goal drives these diverse efforts. The goal is to improve service access, quality, efficiency, and effectiveness in order to improve results. As pressures mount for outcomes accountability, changes aimed at improved services and results may escalate.The fact remains, however, that change is not the same as improvement, and neither change nor improvement automatically yields better results. In fact, pervasive change may result in inefficiencies, create performance gaps, and yield AGENCIES AND PROGRAMS An Intervention Framework for Collaboration Nancy Claiborne & Hal A. Lawson ABSTRACTThis paper provides an intervention framework for collaboration to improve services. When collaboration is an intervention, its development and effectiveness depend on intervention logic.Intervention logic requires a precise conceptualization of collaboration. This conceptualization emphasizes its vital and unique components. It includes a developmental progression in which collaboration is contrasted with companion concepts. It also includes progress benchmarks, outcome measures, and logic models. These models depict relations among the benchmarks and outcomes, and they identify the mediating and moderating variables that account for collaboration's development and effectiveness. These models are designed to improve planning, evaluation, and their relations. This intervention framework for collaboration contrasts sharply with other conceptualizations and strategies. Although its aim is to unify and improve collaboration policy and practice, its inherent selectivity is an obvious limitation.

show abstract

Index of interdisciplinary collaboration

Cited by 123 publications

References 0 publications

Étude exploratoire sur l'implantation, la mise en oeuvre et les retombées du "Projet de référence policière" par différents acteurs du CAVAC Saguenay Lac-Saint-Jean et de la Sûreté du Québec MRC du Fjord du Saguenay /

Étude exploratoire sur l'implantation, la mise en oeuvre et les retombées du "Projet de référence policière" par différents acteurs du CAVAC Saguenay Lac-Saint-Jean et de la Sûreté du Québec MRC du Fjord du Saguenay /

A Collaboration Model for Knowledge Transfer from Sport Science to High Performance Canadian Interuniversity Coaches

An Intervention Framework for Collaboration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About