Index of the cycle of money: the case of Costa Rica

Abstract

The paper aims at determining, in a real-case scenario such as Costa Rica's economic system, how the theoretical basis of the money cycle plays out. The Money Cycle Index takes into account how well a country's economic structure is set up and what kind of financial model it needs to respond to the monetary crisis. Costa Rica's index of the cycle of money calculations is compared to the average global index of the cycle of money. This indicates that Costa Rica is in line with the global average, thus being a good economy, which could be at risk of falling into recession. The methodology shall conform to the theory, mathematics, statistics, and econometrics results. The work is efficient, as it demonstrates the strength of Costa Rica's economy. The application of the theory of the cycle of money to a country's economy has resulted in these results. These are the previous case scenarios from Latvia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Thailand, and Greece. This theory states that to improve the distribution of resources between the economy and smaller companies covering other economic sectors, businesses with a high level of capital should take an interest in manufacturing and technology areas where taxes are lower. The global recession period from 2012 to 2017 shall be used as a basis for compilations., by the Q.E. technique

Velocity of the Escaped Savings and Financial Liquidity on Maximum Mixed Savings

“…Furthermore, the companies of controlled transactions should be estimated tax authorities' inspections are conducted under the condition of proportional adjustments (Fernandez & Raine, 2019;Siegmeier et al, 2018;Urwannachotima et al, 2020;Van de Vijver et al, 2020;Παπακωνσταντίνου et al, 2013). The interpretation of the proportional adjustments condition is that companies that participate in controlled transactions frequently lack the appropriate data and uncontrolled transactions of similar circumstances to compare, so they proportionally adjust their data (Challoumis, 2021a(Challoumis, , 2021h, 2023b(Challoumis, , 2023c(Challoumis, , 2023a(Challoumis, , 2021g, 2021f, 2021b(Challoumis, , 2021c(Challoumis, , 2021e, 2021d(Challoumis, , 2022b(Challoumis, , 2022a. This means that if the tested parties conclude that the profits and losses of companies from uncontrolled transactions are significantly higher or significantly lower, they use a proportional analogy to compare them with their data.…”

2620-102x

“…Furthermore, the companies of controlled transactions should be estimated tax authorities' inspections are conducted under the condition of proportional adjustments (Fernandez & Raine, 2019;Siegmeier et al, 2018;Urwannachotima et al, 2020;Van de Vijver et al, 2020;Παπακωνσταντίνου et al, 2013). The interpretation of the proportional adjustments condition is that companies that participate in controlled transactions frequently lack the appropriate data and uncontrolled transactions of similar circumstances to compare, so they proportionally adjust their data (Challoumis, 2021a(Challoumis, , 2021h, 2023b(Challoumis, , 2023c(Challoumis, , 2023a(Challoumis, , 2021g, 2021f, 2021b(Challoumis, , 2021c(Challoumis, , 2021e, 2021d(Challoumis, , 2022b(Challoumis, , 2022a. This means that if the tested parties conclude that the profits and losses of companies from uncontrolled transactions are significantly higher or significantly lower, they use a proportional analogy to compare them with their data.…”