2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0047404513000857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts

Abstract: It is well documented that the same sociolinguistic feature can be used as a sociolinguistic resource with different indexical potentials in different linguistic as well as social contexts. Often, however, indexical meanings of a specific feature are related to or derived from one another. In this article we present the results of a perceptual study of indexical meanings of alveolar versus fronted (s)-[s] versus [sþ]-in different registers. The data consist of responses to male speakers' use of [s] and [sþ] re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
90
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
90
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research has suggested that the contribution of individual sociolinguistic variables to the social perception of a speaker is influenced by other available information about the speaker (Campbell-Kibler, 2007;Pharao, Maegaard, Spindler Møller, & Kristiansen, 2014). Here we investigate the impact of listener awareness of regional sociolinguistic variation on sociolinguistic perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recent research has suggested that the contribution of individual sociolinguistic variables to the social perception of a speaker is influenced by other available information about the speaker (Campbell-Kibler, 2007;Pharao, Maegaard, Spindler Møller, & Kristiansen, 2014). Here we investigate the impact of listener awareness of regional sociolinguistic variation on sociolinguistic perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The normative irregularity of (ng) adds to a growing body of evidence, suggesting that indexicality is not a ‘fixed property’ of linguistic variables but is in fact a dynamic semiotic field prone to change and reinterpretation: Bucholtz () reports indexical change in the use of guey in Spanish, and parallels can be drawn with a number of studies that have shown distinct indexical fields tied to a variable's use in particular registers and dependent on listener‐specific interpretations and ideologies (Campbell‐Kibler , 2011a; Podesva ; Moore and Podesva ; Pharao et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Johnson, Strand and D'Imperio ; Hay, Warren and Drager ; Pharao et al. ), social stereotypes and ideologies (e.g. Campbell‐Kibler , ; Levon ), and differing frequency distributions of relevant forms (e.g.…”
Section: Advances Absences and Erasuresmentioning
confidence: 99%