Indexing authenticity in visual political (social media) communication: a metapragmatics-based analysis of two visual registers of the authentic

Abstract

In this paper, I apply a metapragmatics-based approach to visual communication, combined with adapted concepts of Social Semiotics (“visual modality”) and CDA-oriented visual analysis (“canons of use”), to reconstruct two visual registers of authenticity which are prevailing within a social media photo sample of recent Austrian chancellor Sebastian Kurz (Facebook, Instagram; total of 84 photos), posted during the parliamentary elections in 2017. Triangulated with the discourse analysis of the marketing manager’s metapragmatic reflections on this social media campaign, the study shows how the partly intertwined registers of (1) “professional sensorism” (as a blended register comprising emblems of sensory modality and balanced composition, thereby drawing on the conceptualization of authenticity as sensory and affective experience of “now”) and (2) “voyeuristic fictionalization” (comprising indexicals associated with fiction genre, and based on the notion of authenticity as arising via “unnoticed observing”) are conceptualized and implemented as a—superior—visual stylization, acting as a social positioning, in mediatized political communication.

Imagining machine vision: Four visual registers from the Chinese AI industry

“…Registers are not limited to the analysis of language, but can also be applied to the study of material signifiers like commodities (Agha 2011) or of multimodal forms of communication like global consumer aesthetics (Jaworski 2015). Our definition of visual registers-distinctive combinations of aesthetic resources that are consistent across a communicative setting-follows recent research in social semiotics addressing the visual construction of institutions (Jancsary et al 2017) or the visual communication of authenticity on social media (Blasch 2021). In the context of corporate websites, we understand visual registers to be consistent repertoires of aesthetic resources encompassing a broad spectrum of modalities ranging from basic design elements like backgrounds and fonts to complex multimodal objects like interactive demos and videos.…”

Google doodles as multimodal storytelling

“…The theoretical background of multimodality research are the fundamental works of Kress and van Leeuwen (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2001;2006;Kress, 2010). New generation of scholars extended the scope of multimodality studies (Blasch, 2021;Moschini & Sindoni, 2021a;Moschini & Sindoni, 2021b;Stöckl, Caple, & Pflaeging, 2019;Matwick, 2016;Popa, 2016;Zentz, 2016). Multimodal communication is becoming more popular as an object of research in linguistics and narratology (Cohn et al, 2017;Krysanova, 2019;Maargaard, 2018;Shevchenko, 2019;Torop, 2019;Yefimenko, 2018).…”

Media-government relations: An analysis in structural functionalist approach

“…Stromberg (2004) said media is concerned with public policy, and social administration of the media, often viewed in a comparative perspective (Ndlovu, 2021). Conclusively, the contents of media are taken as the shared "cultural-indicator" theory (Bauer, 2005); as a demeanor of prevailing ideologies (Parenti, 2010), in a conventional Marxist point of view (Blasch, 2021). And as an extension of the power structure, in the radical-structuralist tradition (Hallin & Mancini, 2011).…”