2012
DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2011.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indexing Uncertain Data in General Metric Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…U P -Index. Recently, Angiulli et al [3] develop a pivot based indexing mechanism for uncertain data in general metric space. For a given pivot point p and an object U , the P DF summary of U is the histogram of the distance distribution regarding p and U .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…U P -Index. Recently, Angiulli et al [3] develop a pivot based indexing mechanism for uncertain data in general metric space. For a given pivot point p and an object U , the P DF summary of U is the histogram of the distance distribution regarding p and U .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper bound of Papp(U, rq) can be derived based on the reverse triangle inequality according to the histogram and the distance between the centre of rq and the pivot point p. Then an object can be pruned based on the upper bound derived. To enhance the pruning power, a set of pivot points are employed in [3]. The advantage of U P -Index is that it can support distance based range query in general metric space.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kanagal et al [6] proposed a structure for correlated probabilistic data based on junction trees, aka clique trees [20]. This subject has been extended to general metric spaces and multidimensions by Fabrizio et al [21] and Zhang et al [22]. Cheng et al [5] and Singh et al [10] developed other indexing methods based on traditional R-trees [23].…”
Section: Pdr Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let D be a dataset with N = 4 and m = 3. Let S1, S2, S3 and S4 be the instantiated distance partitions: S1 = {[2, 2] : 0.33, [4,4] : 0.33, [6,6] : 0.33}, S2 = { [4,8] : 1}, S3 = {[1, 1] : 0.33, [5,5] : 0.33, [9,9] : 0.33} and S4 = {[1, 1] : 0.33, [3,3] : 0.33, [7,7] : 0.33}. The PNN probability estimates determined using the Eq.4 and Eq.…”
Section: Lemma 2 (Dependencies In Distance Partitions)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our experiments, the optimal configuration is Holistic-PkNN-HS, also denoted in short by HolisticPkNN. Similarly to [5], we use the average of the series samples as unique pivot for each uncertain series. We note that the algorithms Baseline, Holistic-PkNN-Virtual and Holistic-PkNN are different algorithms that return the very same result set as defined by the formulation of top-k probable nearest neighbor queries defined in Section 2.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%