2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2009.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

India's changing place in global Proterozoic reconstructions: A review of geochronologic constraints and paleomagnetic poles from the Dharwar, Bundelkhand and Marwar cratons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(181 reference statements)
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poles assigned to the 1.2e1.0 Ga interval relevant to this transition are highlighted in Table 3. Poles from India (Malone et al, 2008;Pradhan et al, 2010) conform reasonably well to APWP defined elsewhere using the 'B' configuration with the exception of the result from the younger Anantapur dykes (1027 AE 13 Ma). Possible correlations of Australian data (e.g.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Poles assigned to the 1.2e1.0 Ga interval relevant to this transition are highlighted in Table 3. Poles from India (Malone et al, 2008;Pradhan et al, 2010) conform reasonably well to APWP defined elsewhere using the 'B' configuration with the exception of the result from the younger Anantapur dykes (1027 AE 13 Ma). Possible correlations of Australian data (e.g.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Moreover, the petrochemical features of the amphibolites reported in this study are comparable to those of Neoproterozoic mafic intrusive rocks from the Seychelles, Andriamena region of north-central Madagascar, and Malani Igneous Suite of northwest India (Tucker et al, 2001;Gregory et al, 2009;Bybee et al, 2010;Pradhan et al, 2010). Thus, we propose that the Seychelles, Madagascar and Lhasa terranes were adjacent to the western and northern margins of Greater India, in a slightly revised configuration of Rodinia supercontinent as proposed by Torsvik et al (1996), Meert and Torsvik (2003), Rino et al (2008) and Bybee et al (2010).…”
Section: Tectonic Implicationssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Precise geochronologic and paleomagnetic studies in some Precambrian terranes have helped in constraining the paleogeographic position of various crustal blocks within different supercontinental assemblies (e.g. Pradhan et al, 2010;Piper, 2010-b). Remnants of the ocean basins that opened during the disruption of former supercontinents which were incorporated during the assembly of subsequent landmasses have also been described from Precambrian terranes.…”
Section: Supercontinent Assembly and Mantle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%