India’s energy future: Contested narratives of change

Abstract

In this perspective article, we undertake a brief empirical analysis of the dominant narratives in debates around India's energy future. India has ambitious goals for increasing renewable energy and enabling universal energy access, but there is little social consensus on how these goals should be achieved. We find two compelling narratives in energy policy debates in the country: 'energy for development' that privileges energy as critical to economic growth and long term strategic security; and 'energy for all' that prioritises the role of energy for basic development and ending poverty. We find that while these narratives find common ground on certain issues such as the role of coal, they clash in the socio-technical imaginaries they represent about India's energy future. Indian energy policy has been characterised so far by top down, centralised policymaking. With this article, we highlight the societal choices that are inherent in discussions about transformations in India's electricity sector and call for further research on the socio-cultural dimensions of future energy pathways in India.

Does Social Businesses Development Affect Bioenergy Industry Growth under the Pathway of Sustainable Development?

“…Likewise, [23] investigates the effect of social activities and renewable energy on carbon emissions, pointing to social activities reduced carbon emissions and economic growth reduced carbon emissions only when social activity is controlled. Likewise, [24] strives for ambitious goals to increase renewable energies and provide universal access to energy within the limited social consensus on how to achieve these goals, referring to energy for development. This favors energy as fundamental to long-term economic growth and strategic security.…”

Whose Narrative is it Anyway? Narratives of Social Innovation in Rural Areas – A Comparative Analysis of Community‐Led Initiatives in Scotland and Spain

“…As part of the preparatory actions prior to the reconfiguring of social practices, initial actors need to communicate the idea for SI (Secco et al 2017b); this is the point at which actors articulate and spread narratives of SI. In particular, narratives: (1) provide local stakeholders with a mean to create an identity and cohesion; (2) constitute a guide for action and (3) enable reframing of the perceived context and structure according to an alternative vision that suit stakeholders intended purpose (Mohan and Topp 2018;Saltmartshe 2018;Wittmayer et al 2019). Similarly to scenario planning exercises, which they are an essential part of, narratives have heuristic value in that they enable local actors to make sense of a complex reality and help them build capacity for the future (Berkhout et al 2002;Rhisiart et al 2015).…”

“…Finally, our analytical framework includes actors as characters in the story who play a role within the SI narrative that may indicate blame and/or responsibility (Mohan and Topp 2018). For instance, characters in the narrative and policy literatures are usually defined as heroes, victims or villains (Jones et al 2014;Shanahan et al 2018).…”

Exploring Energy Pathways for the Low-Carbon Transformation in India—A Model-Based Analysis

“…Furthermore, there are currently two policy narratives for the development of the Indian energy system: the centralized approach, in which the Indian government mainly pushes for the integration of renewables through a unified power grid, and the former being decentralized, providing basic energy access using off-grid solutions [59].…”