2012
DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2012.718878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

India's National and Regional Innovation Systems: Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations for Policy Makers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find an absence of studies on institution-building, with the exception of one study on the challenges of venture capital development in the initial days (Pandey, 1998), and we suggest the need for more such studies to develop deeper historical and contextual understanding of innovation-related institution-building in the Indian context. Among the concerns raised about India's innovation capabilities are the lack of linkages between science and technology capabilities for development (Mouly & Sankaran, 1999), and challenges before India's innovation capacity at the national and regional level (Sharma, Nookala, & Sharma, 2012). Mytelka's (2006) study emphasizes the multiplicity of approaches to address the same concern (here bio/pharmaceutical innovation systems) and the interaction of different types of policies.…”
Section: Theme 1 Institutions and Innovation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find an absence of studies on institution-building, with the exception of one study on the challenges of venture capital development in the initial days (Pandey, 1998), and we suggest the need for more such studies to develop deeper historical and contextual understanding of innovation-related institution-building in the Indian context. Among the concerns raised about India's innovation capabilities are the lack of linkages between science and technology capabilities for development (Mouly & Sankaran, 1999), and challenges before India's innovation capacity at the national and regional level (Sharma, Nookala, & Sharma, 2012). Mytelka's (2006) study emphasizes the multiplicity of approaches to address the same concern (here bio/pharmaceutical innovation systems) and the interaction of different types of policies.…”
Section: Theme 1 Institutions and Innovation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this unit the experts estimated the level of availability of financial resources for small innovative companies, how easy it is to get a grant or to find a private investor. Among the barriers in financial infrastructure it is possible to identify the lack of proprietor funds of project developers, the limited public funding (Doloreux, 2004;Kazakova et al, 2009;Madrid-Guijarro et al, 2009;Savignac, 2006;Sharma et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2007;Vermeulen, 2005;Xie et al, 2010), a small number of venture capitalists (Sharma et al, 2012), the high cost of new product development (Doloreux, 2004;Silva et al, 2007;Tourigny & Le, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this block the experts were asked to evaluate the level of competence of the team of innovative projects, what kind of competences they lack, if they have problems with finding, attracting and retaining qualified staff. Among barriers in the sphere of education can be named the insufficient amount of special educational programs in the field of entrepreneurship and small innovative business development, low qualification of the personnel (Madrid-Guijarro et al, 2009;Tourigny & Le, 2004), low and, consequently, uncompetitive average earnings for researchers in the global market (Gutierrez & Correa, 2012), low quality of education, poor understanding of customer needs, the lack of knowledge on the development and commercialization of project management skills, skilled labor deficit (Doloreux, 2004;Kazakova et al, 2009;Sharma et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2007;Vermeulen, 2005;Xie et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together, they account for 76 percent of the frequency distribution of India inventor addresses. These areas are also where technology business incubators (TBIs), science and technology entrepreneurs parks (STEPs), software technology parks of India (STPIs), and universities and research institutions tend to concentrate (Sharma, Nookala, and Sharma 2012).…”
Section: Data Sources and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%