1998
DOI: 10.2307/840932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indian Common Law: The Role of Custom in American Indian Tribal Courts (Part I of II)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most tribal courts hear a range of case types, though some hear cases in only one subject matter area. 7 Tribal courts are more and less administrative, more and less committed to "traditional" dispute-resolution styles, procedures, and customs, and more and less independent of the rest of the tribal government (Cooter and Fikentscher 1998). They are also variously articulated with the courts of the states that surround them.…”
Section: See National Farmers Union Insurance Companies V Crow Tribe Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most tribal courts hear a range of case types, though some hear cases in only one subject matter area. 7 Tribal courts are more and less administrative, more and less committed to "traditional" dispute-resolution styles, procedures, and customs, and more and less independent of the rest of the tribal government (Cooter and Fikentscher 1998). They are also variously articulated with the courts of the states that surround them.…”
Section: See National Farmers Union Insurance Companies V Crow Tribe Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other geopolitical contexts with large Indigenous populations or substantial Indigenous lands situated in their territory sometimes encompass parallel or overlapping justice systems that serve Indigenous communities. The effects of social shifts and the unique history and cultural identity of Indigenous peoples have resulted in a stunning array of institutional structures, processes, jurisdictional parameters, and kinds of norms across the globe (see Cooter andFikentscher 1998a, 1998b;Richland 2008). State systems sometimes operate in partnership with tribal court systems.…”
Section: Civil Code [民法]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of legal scholars have given some attention to ways in which cultural differences are manifest in American Indian tribal court jurisprudence (Barsh ; Cooter and Fikentscher ; Fletcher ; Pommersheim ; Valencia‐Weber ), only a few cultural anthropologists (MacLachlan ; Miller ; Nesper ; Richland ) have undertaken ethnographic work in the tribal courts themselves. Herein I extend this latter ethnographic work into the domain of the relationship between the state of Wisconsin and the American Indian tribes within the state by examining the ways in which different representations of cultural practice shaped the process of legal codification in the development of Wisconsin Statute P.L.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%