2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2016.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicadores de calidad asistencial de GeSIDA para la atención de personas infectadas por el VIH/sida asociados a mortalidad e ingreso hospitalario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The review included several references to cliniciandriven cohorts and cohort collaborations engaged in driving and monitoring quality improvement in clinical care, for example by performing regular measurements of a range of outcome indicators. However, the clinical care data collected by cohorts on observed differences in health outcomes has only partly been successfully linked to gaps in implementation of guidelines or SoC [20][21][22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review included several references to cliniciandriven cohorts and cohort collaborations engaged in driving and monitoring quality improvement in clinical care, for example by performing regular measurements of a range of outcome indicators. However, the clinical care data collected by cohorts on observed differences in health outcomes has only partly been successfully linked to gaps in implementation of guidelines or SoC [20][21][22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this study was to evaluate the compliance with the quality indicators established by the GeSIDA in a cohort of people living with HIV (PLHIV) and to analyse the influence of those indicators on patient satisfaction. Although some articles have been published on the indicators of the quality of care in the HIV-positive population in different contexts and their relationships with different factors [10,11], the impact of those indicators on patient satisfaction has not been analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%