2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicated preventive interventions for depression in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adolescents with severe depression are at increased risk of self-harm and suicidal ideation. However, the trajectory to severe mental illness can be interrupted or even reversed if children are identified early in the disease course when intervention is most effective (Ssegonja et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescents with severe depression are at increased risk of self-harm and suicidal ideation. However, the trajectory to severe mental illness can be interrupted or even reversed if children are identified early in the disease course when intervention is most effective (Ssegonja et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a substantial proportion of depressed adolescents do not respond to available evidence-based pharmacological and psychological treatments [5], or present with recurrent depressive episodes [6]. Similarly discouraging, the effect of indicated prevention seems to wear off over time [7]. There is therefore the need to identify relevant factors contributing to the persistence and treatment failure of adolescent 1 3 depression, in order to inform potential targets for clinical intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symptom change seen with the four modules together (called STARr-training) seems comparable to pattern seen in conventional CBT. A recent meta-analysis, that compared protocolled CBT based group depression prevention programs for high risk adolescents to inactive controls (e.g., waitlist), showed a superior effect for protocolled CBT with small overall effect sizes at post-intervention and 12-month followup, but negligible overall effect sizes at 6-and >12month follow-up (Ssegonja et al, 2019). The pattern of change we observed appeared comparable, but cannot be compared directly as we investigated within-group effects and did not compare the sequences to an inactive control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analyses have shown that indicated prevention programs based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) can reduce the levels of depressive symptoms and the incidence of depressive disorders among youth (e.g., Horowitz & Garber, 2006;Ssegonja et al, 2019). However, the effect sizes are modest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%