2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0641-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications and graft survival analysis in optical penetrating keratoplasty in a tertiary care center in North India: a 5-year study

Abstract: One- and 2-year survival of grafts at our center is lower as compared to western studies, probably due to higher percentage of poor prognosis indications for surgery and a relative scarcity of excellent-quality donor corneas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pan et al (2012) (in China) and Omar et al(2013) (in Saudi Arabia) had studied outcome of optical PK collectively for various indications (bullous keratopathy, keratoconus, herpetic / non-herpetic scar, regraft, and dystrophies) and mentioned three-year graft clarity of 65.1% and 90.7% respectively. Graft survival in their study was better than ours because keratoconus, dystrophy, degenerations or bullous keratopathy have better prognosis than other indications (Barraquer et al, 2019;Arya et al, 2018;Joshi et al, 2012 ). Arya et al (2018) mentioned graft clarity of 62.5% in non-herpetic scar and 55.6% in herpetic scar; they showed better graft clarity with bullous keratopathy (73.3%) and corneal dystrophy/degeneration (84.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pan et al (2012) (in China) and Omar et al(2013) (in Saudi Arabia) had studied outcome of optical PK collectively for various indications (bullous keratopathy, keratoconus, herpetic / non-herpetic scar, regraft, and dystrophies) and mentioned three-year graft clarity of 65.1% and 90.7% respectively. Graft survival in their study was better than ours because keratoconus, dystrophy, degenerations or bullous keratopathy have better prognosis than other indications (Barraquer et al, 2019;Arya et al, 2018;Joshi et al, 2012 ). Arya et al (2018) mentioned graft clarity of 62.5% in non-herpetic scar and 55.6% in herpetic scar; they showed better graft clarity with bullous keratopathy (73.3%) and corneal dystrophy/degeneration (84.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Keratoplasty is the surgical procedure for treatment of significant viral or microbial corneal scars. Corneal scars do not have as good graft survival rate as compared to keratoconus, corneal dystrophies, and degenerations; vascularized herpetic corneal scars may have even less graft survival rates ( Barraquer et al, 2019;Arya et al, 2018;Joshi et al, 2012). Our previous report shows that in our country, 41% of keratoplasties are performed for active corneal infection and 26.8% for corneal scars, half of which were due to healed infective keratitis (Bajracharya et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Indications are predictors of graft outcome, and it is of concern that more than 80% of keratoplasty procedures were performed in eyes with poor or moderate outcomes. In India, the long-term graft survival rate is poor,[ 38 ] and far less than other advanced healthcare systems in Asia or other parts of the world. Therefore, keratoplasty can only be a part of the solution in reducing corneal blindness in India.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of optical penetrating keratoplasty in various parts of India has reported a survival rate of 65%–67% at one year, which is similar to our study. [ 17 18 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%