2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications for a second prostate biopsy in patients suspected with prostate cancer after an initial negative prostate biopsy

Abstract: BackgroundThe present study aimed to evaluate the indications for a second prostate biopsy in patients suspected with prostate cancer after an initial negative prostate biopsy.MethodsThe present study included 421 patients who underwent repeat prostate biopsy between January 2007 and December 2015 at three hospitals. Clinicopathological data, including patient age, body mass index, history of prostate biopsy, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density, PSA velocity, and PSA fluctuation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PSAV and an increase in the PSA level have been reported as significant predictors of a positive repeat biopsy. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 However, the definitions of these parameters were not consistent among the previous studies in terms of the regular interval for the monitoring of the PSA level. In the present study, the PSAVs calculated at 6-month intervals between the initial and repeat prostate biopsies were not predictors of prostate cancer among all patients and in the sub-groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The PSAV and an increase in the PSA level have been reported as significant predictors of a positive repeat biopsy. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 However, the definitions of these parameters were not consistent among the previous studies in terms of the regular interval for the monitoring of the PSA level. In the present study, the PSAVs calculated at 6-month intervals between the initial and repeat prostate biopsies were not predictors of prostate cancer among all patients and in the sub-groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, the possibility of PCa should always be kept in mind, and these patients should be closely followed up with serial digital rectal examination and serum PSA measurements. Or, as such in recent years, the use of various imaging techniques such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, sonoelastography, and multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may be rationale [7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%