diagnostic accuracy, tumor grading, prognosis, assessment of therapeutic response, assessment of tumor extent, biopsy, and radiotherapy planning, while it also valuable for differentiating between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis in brain metastases. Brain tumor uptake on MET images can be affected by amino acid transport (sodiumindependent L-transporter, LAT1, 2, and 3), MET metabolism, tumor vascular bed-dependent blood flow, microvessel density, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) distribution [1][2][3]. The accumulation of MET through these mechanisms is visualized as tissue uptake on PET images, with MET being incorporated into most brain tumors, including low-grade gliomas. In general, MET uptake is lower in low-grade than in high-grade gliomas, although there is considerable overlap between these two groups, as well as between histological types [4,5]. However, several previous reports have demonstrated MET uptake in lesions associated with benign brain diseases [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Although Ito et al. [6] have already reported on the imaging spectrum and pitfalls of MET-PET/CT in intracranial lesions, in this review we focus on and introduce imaging characteristics of MET uptake in benign brain disease through a literature review. We recommend physician interpretation of imaging findings and disease characteristics for optimal patient management. Benign uptake must be identified to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgical operations. These pitfalls in MET-PET image interpretation are important not only for nuclear medicine professionals, but also for radiologists.
Methods for the assessment of MET-PET imagesMany reports have made visual assessments and semiquantitative evaluations of MET-PET/CT. The visual assessment of MET-PET images is straightforward and easy.Abstract 11 C-methionine (MET) is one of the most commonly used positron emission tomography (PET) tracers for evaluation of malignant brain tumor, with MET-PET being a sensitive technique for visualization of primary and recurrent malignant brain tumors. However, previous reports have demonstrated MET uptake in lesions associated with benign brain diseases. These diseases usually show an increase in MET uptake similar to that of malignant tumors. This pitfall in MET-PET image interpretation is important not only for nuclear medicine professionals, but also for radiologists. In this review, we demonstrate the imaging characteristics of MET uptake in benign brain disease, and recommend physician interpretation of imaging findings and disease characteristics for optimal patient management. Benign uptake must be identified to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgical operations.