Indications for permanent pacing, device, and lead selection

Chang, Philip M.; Carter, Christopher; Bar‐Cohen, Yaniv

doi:10.1002/9781119333050.ch3

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 112 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Epicardial pacemaker lead placement and use of device technology in innovative ways often need to be considered to provide pacing in the youngest patients. [20][21][22] Any pacemaker system used in a young patient may need to be utilized for multiple decades, and consideration of the long-term consequences from device and lead failure plays a role in implantation of pediatric devices.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consenus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology, (ACC) and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate follow-up in pediatric patients.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients

Shah

Silka

Silva

et al. 2021

Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indications for permanent pacing, device, and lead selection

Cited by 4 publications

References 112 publications

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About