“…TAVR is an ideal setting to advance the field of patient-specific modelling, as the substrate of the TAVR population, with highly calcified implantation sites, present fewer variations in terms of mechanical properties compared to other cardiovascular sites or patient groups ( Pham et al, 2017 ). TAVR outcomes depend on appropriate patient assessment ( Kalogeras, 2012 , Ruparelia and Prendergast, 2015 ), and complications such as paravalvular leak (PVL) ( Azadani et al, 2009 , Tamburino et al, 2011 ) and onset of conduction abnormalities leading to permanent pacemaker implantation ( Binder et al, 2013 , Bleiziffer et al, 2010 ) remain common, therefore warranting a patient-specific computational approach to enhance patient selection ( Schoenhagen et al, 2011 , Taylor and Figueroa, 2009 , Vy et al, 2015 ). A few patient-specific computational models are already available in the literature for TAVR ( Bianchi et al, 2016 , Capelli et al, 2012 , Gunning et al, 2014 , Morganti et al, 2014 , Sirois et al, 2011 , Sturla et al, 2016 , Wang et al, 2015 , Wu et al, 2016 ), but choice of the material parameters for the implantation site remains open ( Tseng et al, 2013 ).…”