2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04392-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications, success, and adverse event rates of pediatric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Amirhossein Hosseini,
Mohammad Hassan Sohouli,
Elham Sharifi
et al.

Abstract: Background To improve knowledge on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in children, we aimed to study the proportion of indications, success rate and complication of ERCP. Methods We performed a systematic search of all articles published up to December 2022 in the following databases: Cochrane Library, PubMed (MEDLINE) and Scopus. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was determined by the I2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) involves 3%–16% of patients with chronic relapsing pancreatitis ( 21 ). Although specific pediatric guidelines are lacking, hydration, indomethacin, and stenting can be considered and used as preventive mechanisms ( 21 24 ). A possible limitation of pediatric endoscopic therapy, as we experienced during ERCP, is the impossibility of inserting and making the stent progress through the duct/reducing the potential for drainage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) involves 3%–16% of patients with chronic relapsing pancreatitis ( 21 ). Although specific pediatric guidelines are lacking, hydration, indomethacin, and stenting can be considered and used as preventive mechanisms ( 21 24 ). A possible limitation of pediatric endoscopic therapy, as we experienced during ERCP, is the impossibility of inserting and making the stent progress through the duct/reducing the potential for drainage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%