2020 Resilience Week (RWS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/rws50334.2020.9241287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicator-based Safety and Security Assessment of Offshore Wind Farms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lutz et al present a digitalization workflow in the wind energy domain, to extract and structure maintenance data as a basis for reliability KPI calculation [2]. Frank et al [14] present a methodology that uses KPIs and key risk indicators to assess the safety and security of offshore wind farms.…”
Section: Kpi Using Knowledge Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lutz et al present a digitalization workflow in the wind energy domain, to extract and structure maintenance data as a basis for reliability KPI calculation [2]. Frank et al [14] present a methodology that uses KPIs and key risk indicators to assess the safety and security of offshore wind farms.…”
Section: Kpi Using Knowledge Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of OWF maintenance, there are following relevant KPIs: Operational Availability (OA), Mean Time To Recover (MTTR), Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), and Inoperable Assets (IA) (Torres et al 2020, Parmenter 2007, Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO) (2018, Standards Policy andStrategy Committee 2019, Moran 2019). One can note, that these parameters are interconnected, e.g., IA is directly linked to OA, MTTR, and MTBF.…”
Section: Maintenance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first step, the general safety and security goals of a OWF had to be identified. With the help of experts and stakeholders, nine categories were defined, which are further explained in Table 1 [9,12,16,36]. Next, the stakeholder groups had to be identified.…”
Section: The Survey and Analysis Of Stakeholder Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%