2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2013.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicator-based urban sustainability—A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
142
0
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
142
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Indicators provide information about an energy system (Guy and Kibert, 1998) and show how well the system is working or help to determine what direction should be taken to address any issues with the system (Hiremath et al, 2013). They can be appropriate tools for communicating and promoting dialogue related to sustainable development between stakeholders, policy makers and the public (Vera and Langlois, 2007) as well as enable decision makers to choose when, how, and where to deploy systems for sustainable development (Buchholz et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators provide information about an energy system (Guy and Kibert, 1998) and show how well the system is working or help to determine what direction should be taken to address any issues with the system (Hiremath et al, 2013). They can be appropriate tools for communicating and promoting dialogue related to sustainable development between stakeholders, policy makers and the public (Vera and Langlois, 2007) as well as enable decision makers to choose when, how, and where to deploy systems for sustainable development (Buchholz et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed evaluation framework will enable smart cities to strengthen their strategic planning efforts and measure their progress [45]. Under this framework, a city's quality of life will be evaluated, findings compared over time, and its progress toward smart city goals monitored in relation to the extent to which its policy goals have been achieved.…”
Section: Methodology and Objectives Of Urban Quality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lynch et al explored the characteristics of existing indicator systems, reviewed 22 systems with 377 indicators and a database of 145 candidate indicators were identified [18]. In general, indices for measuring sustainability consist of ecological footprint, environmental sustainability index, genuine progress indicator, human development index and city development index [14,18], and decoupling environmental pressures from economic growth has been proposed as the inter-linked objectives for enhancing cost-effective and operational environmental policies in the context of sustainability [19][20][21][22]. Previous studies on decoupling much more focused on particular sources of environmental pressure, such as natural resource utilization, energy consumption, or pollution emissions [22][23][24], and mostly taken countries or provinces as studied cases, while lacking of the investigations into city level decoupling research [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cities attract a growing number of humans and anthropogenic assets, while natural elements suffer a decrease almost equivalent to the increase in humans and man-made assets [3,12]. During the past years, aiming to improve the understandings on a city's sustainability and served for policy-making and monitoring in reality, sets of indicators for measuring a city's sustainability have been developed by different communities [13,14]. For instance, Voula and Pedersen in their report recognized the need for sustainability indicators as tools for quantifying sustainability performance [15], The National Statistical Institute of Italy presented a provisional list of urban environmental sustainability indicators, which are of particular interest for cities in Italy [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%