2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
142
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
142
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Benefits of land use can be seen as outputs. Two sorts of outputs are distinguished (Wiggering et al 2006): (1) commodity outputs (tangible benefits), which are defined as the goods that are sold on a market. Non-commodity outputs (intangible benefits) (2) may be the production of positive externalities or the reduction of negative externalities.…”
Section: Trade-offsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefits of land use can be seen as outputs. Two sorts of outputs are distinguished (Wiggering et al 2006): (1) commodity outputs (tangible benefits), which are defined as the goods that are sold on a market. Non-commodity outputs (intangible benefits) (2) may be the production of positive externalities or the reduction of negative externalities.…”
Section: Trade-offsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one relates to the abandonment of agricultural activity (agriculture extensification), which is expressed, for example, by a gradual discontinuance of intensive agrarian activity or an increase in the acreage of follow farmland. This course of change is being observed in all European countries, where agricultural activity is becoming progressively less important or marginal in relation to other economic activities or land use (Wiggering et al 2006;Pinto-Correia, Breman, 2008). Another symptom of rural area marginalisation is a deterioration of socio-demographic and infrastructure conditions (community marginalisation), manifested inter alia, by depopulation and a worsening of the living condition of ru-ral gminas.…”
Section: Methods and Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the limitations of area and utilization competition, these modified landscape configurations will confront public and policy actors with multiple challenges for SD. To assess SD at the landscape level, it is essential to connect the future demand and supply of region-specific portfolios of functions related to land use [6,7]. Hence, an ex-ante Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) of the anticipated effects on land use related functions [8] in the research area of north-eastern Germany and, in particular, the types of area lowland fens and sewage farms is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainable development (SD) is characterized as a multi-level, multi-sectoral and cross-policy issue [5]. Land use changes always have intended and non-intended effects [6]. Consequently, land and water management stand in an area of tension between different region-specific uses and protection logics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%