2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17215-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicators System for Quality Assurance in Higher Education Within the Economic Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the SA program has raised awareness of teaching quality issues, the effects have been primarily centered around increasing bureaucracy rather than bringing about substantive improvements in quality education. Quality assurance processes are compound and require a more significant number of stakeholders and, therefore, more challenging to measure (Ivana et al, 2019). Examining impact is a multipart question; consequently, it requires a more elaborated research design and greater time horizons of observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the SA program has raised awareness of teaching quality issues, the effects have been primarily centered around increasing bureaucracy rather than bringing about substantive improvements in quality education. Quality assurance processes are compound and require a more significant number of stakeholders and, therefore, more challenging to measure (Ivana et al, 2019). Examining impact is a multipart question; consequently, it requires a more elaborated research design and greater time horizons of observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%