2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.regg.2009.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Índice de Charlson versus índice de Barthel como predictor de mortalidad e institucionalización en una unidad geriátrica de agudos y media estancia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, among hospitalized elderly subjects, functional impairment rather than comorbidity and indices of disease burden have been recognized as the strongest predictors of outcomes [36-38]. The Barthel Index could therefore be more useful than other indexes when considering an adequate use of healthcare services [24]. Cognitive impairment is the other pillar of this model, and it has been validated as an excellent predictor of adverse outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, among hospitalized elderly subjects, functional impairment rather than comorbidity and indices of disease burden have been recognized as the strongest predictors of outcomes [36-38]. The Barthel Index could therefore be more useful than other indexes when considering an adequate use of healthcare services [24]. Cognitive impairment is the other pillar of this model, and it has been validated as an excellent predictor of adverse outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geriatricians also carried out the initial evaluations, which included an exhaustive review of medical and pharmacological histories and an assessment of the functional abilities and comorbid conditions of the subjects using the Barthel and Charlson indexes, respectively. Both questionnaires have been previously validated and their use demonstrated in an elderly Spanish population [21, 22]. Design and methodology are fully described in a previous publication [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, NHFS, O-Possum, and other indexes have been developed and are in use [5]. Among the various risk factors associated with higher mortality in older patients with hip fracture are biodemographic factors, such as male gender and age, clinical factors such as ASA class for anesthetic risk or comorbidity rates, and care factors such as surgical delay [6, 7], but also previous functional situation could have been related with short-term mortality [8, 9] and some geriatric scores have previously studied as predictors of short-term mortality for patients undergoing surgery [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%