2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42806-2_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenizing Water Governance in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We view the absence of Indigenous inclusion and engagement in watershed planning as a missed opportunity on several fronts. First, while watershed planning requires participation of multiple partners, stakeholders and rights holders (Montgomery et al, 2016), there is a strong normative emphasis on the inclusion of Indigenous voices, knowledge, and interests in water governance more generally (Bradford et al, 2017). Second, water (and land) management to control for water quality and quantity within a watershed will be more efficient when coordinated between and among watershed groups, actors, and organizations, including First Nations, Métis, and Indigenous organizations (Noble, 2016;Udofia et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We view the absence of Indigenous inclusion and engagement in watershed planning as a missed opportunity on several fronts. First, while watershed planning requires participation of multiple partners, stakeholders and rights holders (Montgomery et al, 2016), there is a strong normative emphasis on the inclusion of Indigenous voices, knowledge, and interests in water governance more generally (Bradford et al, 2017). Second, water (and land) management to control for water quality and quantity within a watershed will be more efficient when coordinated between and among watershed groups, actors, and organizations, including First Nations, Métis, and Indigenous organizations (Noble, 2016;Udofia et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, researchers suggest that inclusion of Indigenous Peoples in water governance is more important than in water management (Bradford, Ovsenek, & Bharadwaj, 2017;Castleden, Hart, Cunsolo, Harper, & Martin, 2017), eschewing their potential role as citizen stakeholders within provincial processes (Porten, Loë, & Plummer, 2015). Although participation in state-based management and planning processes has some barriers and opportunities, as recognized in the literature cited above, it may be that a strategy of pragmatism that includes consensus, conflict, social protest, and participation is more effective than other approaches in isolation (Borrows, 2005;Hanna, Langdon, & Vanclay, 2016;Maclean, Robinson, & Natcher, 2015;Wanvik & Caine, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iv For more information on indigenous water governance in BC and Canada see: Simms (2015) and Bradford, Ovsenek, & Bhardwaj (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, First Nations contest the sovereign authority claimed by the state, and resist or otherwise attempt to influence the hegemonic activities of the state. They do so by litigating against the government for trespassing on Indigenous rights [57], participating in institutional processes [47,58,59], as well as educating themselves and others about treaty-based relationships [60], Indigenous rights [50,61], and Indigenous world views [62][63][64][65].…”
Section: The Politics Of Colonial Water Governance In Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%