2013
DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2011.654236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous free prior informed consent: a case for self determination in World Heritage nomination processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative proportion of World Heritage properties from developed countries, especially those in Europe, continues to increase despite the stated aim of the World Heritage Committee for over two decades being to have a World Heritage List repre sentative of world's cultural and natural heritage. Alongside this, Indigenous, local and minority communities are increasingly calling for their heritage values and their cultural and human rights to be recognised in the nomination, inscription and man agement World Heritage properties (Hales et al 2013; International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs 2012) and in the evaluation of nominations in the context of what many now see as politicised decision-making by the World Heritage Committee (Ashworth and van der Aa 2006; De Cesari 2010; Frey and Steiner 2011;Jokilehto 2012;Meskell 2012).…”
Section: A Smithmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative proportion of World Heritage properties from developed countries, especially those in Europe, continues to increase despite the stated aim of the World Heritage Committee for over two decades being to have a World Heritage List repre sentative of world's cultural and natural heritage. Alongside this, Indigenous, local and minority communities are increasingly calling for their heritage values and their cultural and human rights to be recognised in the nomination, inscription and man agement World Heritage properties (Hales et al 2013; International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs 2012) and in the evaluation of nominations in the context of what many now see as politicised decision-making by the World Heritage Committee (Ashworth and van der Aa 2006; De Cesari 2010; Frey and Steiner 2011;Jokilehto 2012;Meskell 2012).…”
Section: A Smithmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pacific Island and Indigenous and local communities elsewhere are increasingly expressing their wish and their right to have their values represented on the World Heritage List through active participation in the World Heritage process (Hales et al 2013;Ween 2012). The recent International Expert Workshop on the World Heritage Convention and Indigenous Peoples (International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs 2012) and the resulting 'World Heritage and Indigenous Peoples Call to Action' requests that the United Nations Declaration on the Rights o f Indigenous Peoples be recognised, respected and promoted in World Heritage processes and the free, prior and informed consent of Indigenous peoples be obtained in relation to any potential or actual World Heritage property incorporating or affecting Indige nous peoples' lands, territories or resources.…”
Section: Pacific Communities Indigenous Peoples and Customary Ownersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples was adopted by the General Assembly in 2007 (United Nations 2007). The principle of Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) is a key concept presented in the Declaration and has become an integral part of the Indigenous human rights agenda (Hales et al 2013). 5 The Australian Native Title Act of 1993 followed the historic Mabo decision in 1992, which recognised Indigenous rights to land (Howlett et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cluster also shows a co-occurrence among the “impact assessment”, “indigenous peoples”, and “indigenous rights”, revealing further concerns about the human right of those people belonging to these groups. The right to free prior informed consent (FPIC) is protected by the United Nations (UN) Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the international HR agenda for indigenous people [ 89 ].…”
Section: Science Mapping Of Human Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%