2020
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2020.1833114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous Hawaiian Psychoactive Drug Use: Before European Contact, and after 1778

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful adaptation to the conditions of State-sanctioned incarceration is contingent on self-preservation or a highly selfish survival-oriented morality. For example, State-subsidized drug abuse treatment programs and the State’s criminal justice system work in tandem to coercively compel Hawaiian people into abstinence-oriented lifestyles and regard any substance use—whether for spiritual reasons, communal bonding, cultural revitalization of indigenous psychoactive drug use, or motivated by other intent with therapeutic purpose such as a response to unknowing cultural loss, oppression, historical trauma and generations of forced assimilation (e.g., Coomber & South, 2004; Edwards et al, 1983; Pokhrel & Herzog, 2014; Williams, 2016; Williams, Makini et al, 2021; Williams, Rezentes, et al, 2021; Williams, Davis, et al, 2021)—as problematic social activity that is emblematic of failure, worthy of treatment termination, and warrants a suspension of free will. Kalant and Kalant (1966) underscore the so-called “bad” effect of drug use:…the traditional view of Europeans and North Americans would be that such an effect is bad because it impairs useful work, diminishes productivity, and lowers the material standard of living of a large number of people who may become charges upon the rest of society.…”
Section: The Constitutive Cultural Elements Of Die “Systems Of Care”mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Successful adaptation to the conditions of State-sanctioned incarceration is contingent on self-preservation or a highly selfish survival-oriented morality. For example, State-subsidized drug abuse treatment programs and the State’s criminal justice system work in tandem to coercively compel Hawaiian people into abstinence-oriented lifestyles and regard any substance use—whether for spiritual reasons, communal bonding, cultural revitalization of indigenous psychoactive drug use, or motivated by other intent with therapeutic purpose such as a response to unknowing cultural loss, oppression, historical trauma and generations of forced assimilation (e.g., Coomber & South, 2004; Edwards et al, 1983; Pokhrel & Herzog, 2014; Williams, 2016; Williams, Makini et al, 2021; Williams, Rezentes, et al, 2021; Williams, Davis, et al, 2021)—as problematic social activity that is emblematic of failure, worthy of treatment termination, and warrants a suspension of free will. Kalant and Kalant (1966) underscore the so-called “bad” effect of drug use:…the traditional view of Europeans and North Americans would be that such an effect is bad because it impairs useful work, diminishes productivity, and lowers the material standard of living of a large number of people who may become charges upon the rest of society.…”
Section: The Constitutive Cultural Elements Of Die “Systems Of Care”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hawai‘i, the Native Hawaiian government attempted to combat the trafficking of alcohol to Hawaiians through public policy while simultaneously avoiding draconian punishments and the over-incarceration of Hawaiians (Williams, Makini, et al, 2021). Instead of targeting Native Hawaiian users, the kingdom regulated the commercial trade of alcohol, attempting to prevent European powers from inundating the Islands with alcohol (Williams, Makini, et al, 2021). Unlike the indigenous Hawaiian beverage, ‘awa, Inglis (1975) notes that alcohol’s function as an intoxicant “was in the colonists’ self-interest to encourage it” (p. 59) as it would “take away understanding” (p. 29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation